Teams

KY/LOU/BOHN

2025 USTA FALL 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-12-14vs KY/LOU/RENDA/HUDSONLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Ford / Karen Weathers vs Carrie Merrill / Kelley Roberts7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesVicki Bohn / Maryjanice Beavin vs Heather Hise / Katie Windhorst2-6, 4-6
2025-10-19vs KY/LOU/RENDA/HUDSONWon 20
W#1 DoublesDebra Miller / Leigh Preston vs Carrie Merrill / Heather Hise2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVicki Bohn / Beth Spears vs Christine Sillings / Martha Hudson6-4, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Beth Spears
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Karen Weathers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Leah Montgomery
published
3.02
Mechelle Kaufman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Mary Collier
published
2.86
Karen Bickers
published
2.85
Leigh Shader
published
2.84
Leigh Preston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Jennifer Schultz
published
2.72
Maryjanice Beavin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Mary Smiley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Vicki Bohn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Spears + Leah Montgomery3743% games−2.9% vs expected
Mechelle Kaufman + Karen Weathers2354% gamesnot enough data
Vicki Bohn + Leigh Shader0521% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth Spears
6W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Karen Weathers
24W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.13
Leah Montgomery
3W–13L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
Mechelle Kaufman
38W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Mary Collier
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Karen Bickers
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.86
Leigh Shader
0W–13L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.85
Leigh Preston
10W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Jennifer Schultz
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
2.83
Maryjanice Beavin
1W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Mary Smiley
10W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Vicki Bohn
1W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.