Teams

Heber Valley Tennis

2026 Fall Outdoor League-Saturday · 4.0M

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings6 teams · 4.0M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Heber Valley Tennis000000
2Liberty Park-Wright000000
3SunPro-George000000
4Eccles-Dalpe000000
5Liberty Park-Vorasane000000
6Sports Mall-Granger/Osley000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Francisco Rubio
published 4
3.73
3.67
Brigham Berg
published 4
3.67
Lucas Silva
published
3.64
Dave King
published 4
3.64
Timothy McNeill
published
3.59
Josh Runyan
published
3.56
Todd Holmberg
published
3.45
John Platt
published
3.36
Keith Wills
published 3.5
Michael Grass
published
Ryan Miller
published
Tony Owens
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gavin Christensen + Todd Holmberg224 matchesnot enough data
Francisco Rubio + Dave King123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Francisco Rubio
44W–38L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Gavin Christensen
8W–9L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Brigham Berg
3W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.67
Lucas Silva
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.67
4
Dave King
9W–31L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
Timothy McNeill
58W–35L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.64
Josh Runyan
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.59
Todd Holmberg
9W–15L career · no lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
John Platt
1W–7L career · no lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.45
3.5
Keith Wills
11W–24L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
3.36
Michael Grass
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ryan Miller
10W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tony Owens
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.