Teams

4S:Shore Thing:Twiss

2023 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Winter · 3.0 W 4

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesKatie Robshaw / Jane Lucas vs Meg Schwanhausser / Ali Caravella2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSonia Donovan / Valerie de Stefanis vs Aimee Ableman / Gina Ortolano2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCaroline Schreder / Sara Lebovitz vs Tara Wurm / Christina Passaretti4-6, 1-6
2023-01-27vs 4S:Nice Aces:Decore/KeatingWon 21
L#1 DoublesValerie de Stefanis / Katie Robshaw vs Lynn Perna / Denise Worst0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSonia Donovan / Averi Dudek vs Michelle Briody / Christine Hooper6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLaura Rowley / Candace Twiss vs Trisha Kokas / Lorraine Catalano6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-12-16Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJane Lucas vs Aimee Ableman4-6, 4-6
2022-10-21vs 4S:Nice Aces:Decore/KeatingWon 31
W#1 DoublesMandi Schmauch / Jane Lucas vs Karen Keating / Christine Hooper6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesValerie de Stefanis vs Lynn Perna1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKristen Campbell / Carrie Mattison vs Michelle Briody / Trisha Kokas6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCandace Twiss / Sonia Donovan vs Lorraine Catalano / Nancy Zangre6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings24 teams · 3.0 W 4
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WD - GCC:Stars:Arraya000000
2CP:Chelsea Chicks:Losada/Sullivan0842755366
3IA:Overserved:Coelho/Neuenfeldt09211532277
4OGT:Synergy 3.0:duToit09201432264
5GRC:3.0:Leon/Fix09161942321
6SOL:Slammers:Muslim/Wilkes09112350373
7SOL:Smashers:O'Connor/Pizzarelli010281128299
8OGT:Happy Hitters:Echevarria/Vranos010251329286
9CP:Chelsea's Smart Aces:Foley/McKinney010261234307
10IA:Jammers:Huang/Haight010231534295
11KH:You Got Served:Kaplan01013978465
12INT:All Set:Donnelly011222150382
13INT:Sweet Slices:Donnelly011133164428
14KH:Shake and Serve:Donovan/Sparkman012361231324
15NC:Ball Busters:Lehnert012331433339
16KH:Racquettes:MacDonald/Colker012331537364
17MRC:Sets and the City:Conroy012281947409
184S:Positive Spin:Gaspar/Golan012252047377
19NC:Racquettes:Giordano012262153447
20TCT:Drop Shot Divas:VanZyl012222655428
214S:Shore Thing:Twiss012173167484
22NC:Super Deuces:Doka/Gill012163268483
234S:Nice Aces:Decore/Keating012153368463
24FIT:Both Sides Now:Langham/English012113778501

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Jane Lucas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.02
Carrie Mattison
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Sonia Donovan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Averi Dudek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Caroline Schreder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Mandi Schmauch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Laura Rowley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Candace Twiss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.33
Lauren Allen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Valerie de Stefanis
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Blaire Meck
published
Katie Robshaw
published
Kimberly Sponza
published
Michele Sweeney
published
Sara Lebovitz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Averi Dudek + Blaire Meck2343% games−1.4% vs expected
Candace Twiss + Caroline Schreder0732% games−7.8% vs expected
Candace Twiss + Valerie de Stefanis0532% games−11.0% vs expected
Candace Twiss + Averi Dudek4645% gamesnot enough data
Candace Twiss + Kimberly Sponza123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jane Lucas
44W–27L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Carrie Mattison
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.02
Sonia Donovan
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Averi Dudek
14W–27L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3
Caroline Schreder
1W–20L career · type A · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Mandi Schmauch
28W–30L career · 1 line in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
Laura Rowley
14W–24L career · 1 line in 2023
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Candace Twiss
16W–40L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
2.50
Lauren Allen
13W–39L career · 2 lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
2.33
Valerie de Stefanis
24W–61L career · 3 lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
2.26
Blaire Meck
2W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katie Robshaw
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberly Sponza
5W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michele Sweeney
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sara Lebovitz
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.