Teams

HOA-REG-Valdez/18&Over8.0MXD

18 & Over Mixed Section Championship · 8.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 4.17 / KANSAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · 8.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IA-REG-Young/18&Over8.0MXD000000
2NE-REG-Erwin/Redding/18&Over8.0MXD000000
3OK-REG-Adams000000
4STL-REG-Sandweiss/18+Over8.0MXD000000
5KS-REG-Whitmer/Becker/18&Over8.0MXD000000
6HOA-REG-Valdez/18&Over8.0MXD000000
7OKWC-REG-Nagode-Little000000
8NEWC-REG-Tegler/18&OverMXD8.0000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Daniel Miskowic
published 4.5
3.96
Kelly Parrish
published
3.76
Dina Mitchell
published
Andrew Hall
published 4
3.75
Daniel Knox
published 4
3.74
Robert Buckner
published
3.56
Ruth Knox
published
3.55
Lara Maple
published
3.52
Jeff Ganaden
published
3.35
Kelli Valdez
published
Jennifer Carpenter
published
Ryan Carpenter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Ganaden + Lara Maple15955% games+5.4% vs expected
Ruth Knox + Ryan Carpenter1444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Miskowic
68W–41L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
4.07
Kelly Parrish
49W–27L career · no lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
3.96
Dina Mitchell
154W–77L career · no lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.76
4
Andrew Hall
34W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Daniel Knox
54W–27L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Robert Buckner
37W–35L career · no lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.74
Ruth Knox
136W–121L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.56
Lara Maple
109W–84L career · no lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.55
Jeff Ganaden
99W–82L career · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
Kelli Valdez
71W–42L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.35
Jennifer Carpenter
42W–28L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ryan Carpenter
22W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.