Teams

Duval/Cleek/18&Over7.5W

2024 Duval Combo 18 & Over -Spring · 7.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-24vs Club Continental - DonnellyWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Cleek / Heidi McLeod vs Sherri Ouchi / Alexa Fritz6-1, 7-6
2024-06-20vs Boone Park - LansangLost 01
L#3 DoublesHeidi McLeod / Catherine Harrison vs Annalee Lansang / Kimberly Rogers3-6, 1-6
2024-06-13vs Club Continental - DonnellyWon 10
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Bell Egan / Catherine Harrison vs Jen Varran / Maria Dekar6-2, 6-1
2024-05-23vs Club Continental - DonnellyWon 10
W#3 DoublesJayne Coffing / Catherine Harrison vs Donna Marceau / Katharine Healey6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2024-04-18vs Boone Park - LansangLost 01
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Bell Egan / Heidi McLeod vs Courtney Luffler / Jill Gray4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Jacqueline Bell Egan
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.81
Addison Crenshaw
published 4
3.79
Jennifer Cleek
published
3.77
Heather LaPrade
published 4
3.76
Kathy Parker
published
3.75
Catherine Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Jayne Coffing
published
3.73
Stephanie Mock
published
3.57
Leah Baggs
published
3.53
Jenny Meide
published
3.50
Heidi McLeod
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
Lisa Goodrich
published
Kara Lenz
published
Tracy Streva
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Bell Egan + Heather LaPrade9852% games+2.1% vs expected
Jacqueline Bell Egan + Catherine Harrison303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jacqueline Bell Egan
145W–100L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Addison Crenshaw
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.81
Jennifer Cleek
18W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Heather LaPrade
101W–76L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Kathy Parker
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Catherine Harrison
14W–9L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Jayne Coffing
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Stephanie Mock
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.73
Leah Baggs
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
Jenny Meide
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
Heidi McLeod
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.50
Lisa Goodrich
9W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.43
Kara Lenz
43W–22L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tracy Streva
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.