Teams

Hastings Hustlers

2023 55&Over Men Winter · 7.0 Fall

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-02-24vs Armonk Tennis - JimenezLost 12
L#1 DoublesGreg Leeds / Dan Siegel vs Robert Slotoroff / Edmund Yee2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRichard Getler / David Lerer vs Anthony Carroll / Peter Novick6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesFong Chin / Robert McCoach vs John Attinger / Jerry Lucadamo7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2023-02-11vs Chestnut RidgeLost 12
L#1 DoublesDan Siegel / Greg Leeds vs Michael Singer / Andrew Weiss6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHoward Weidner / Raymond Schaeffer vs Phillip Raclyn / Raul Monges3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDan Raz / David Lerer vs Stanley Marcinowicz / Meynardo Alina6-4, 6-3
2023-02-03vs Armonk Tennis - JimenezLost 02
L#1 DoublesGreg Leeds / Dan Siegel vs Andrew Hatt / Robert Slotoroff6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRobert McCoach / Raymond Schaeffer vs Anthony Carroll / Peter Novick6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2023-01-21vs Chestnut RidgeWon 21
W#1 DoublesRobert McCoach / Dan Siegel vs Phillip Raclyn / Raul Monges6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRaymond Schaeffer / Howard Weidner vs Frank Ruiz / Andrew Weiss6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Lerer / Fong Chin vs Swamy Sunkara / Stanley Marcinowicz6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-01-14vs Armonk Tennis - JimenezWon 21
W#1 DoublesGreg Leeds / Dan Siegel vs Robert Slotoroff / Edmund Yee6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDan Raz / Fong Chin vs Andrew Hatt / John Attinger1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesRichard Cohen / Kenneth Kirshbaum vs Anthony Carroll / Michael Mendelsohn4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-01-07vs Armonk Tennis - JimenezWon 30
W#1 DoublesGreg Leeds / Dan Siegel vs Andrew Hatt / Mark Gressle6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDan Raz / Fong Chin vs Robert Slotoroff / Michael Mendelsohn6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRichard Getler / Kenneth Kirshbaum vs Anthony Carroll / Jerry Lucadamo6-2, 6-0
2022-12-17vs Chestnut RidgeLost 02
L#1 DoublesGreg Leeds / Dan Siegel vs Michael Singer / Phillip Raclyn1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesFong Chin / David Lerer vs Raul Monges / Meynardo Alina3-6, 4-6
2022-11-19vs Chestnut RidgeWon 30
W#1 DoublesHoward Weidner / Robert McCoach vs Phillip Raclyn / Andrew Weiss6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDan Raz / David Lerer vs Stanley Marcinowicz / Swamy Sunkara6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKenneth Kirshbaum / Raymond Schaeffer vs Meynardo Alina / STUART LONGMAN6-0, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Armonk Tennis - Jimenez08141023199
2Hastings Hustlers08131126189
3Chestnut Ridge0891536241

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Richard Getler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Greg Leeds
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Dan Raz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Dan Siegel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
David Lerer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Fong Chin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Frank Petrilli
published
Howard Weidner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
John Duval
published
Kenneth Kirshbaum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Raymond Schaeffer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Richard Cohen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robert McCoach
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Siegel + Greg Leeds121650% gamesnot enough data
Dan Siegel + Richard Cohen8356% gamesnot enough data
Robert McCoach + Raymond Schaeffer5359% gamesnot enough data
Dan Siegel + Raymond Schaeffer4353% gamesnot enough data
Robert McCoach + Frank Petrilli6083% gamesnot enough data
Robert McCoach + Kenneth Kirshbaum5171% gamesnot enough data
David Lerer + Fong Chin1543% gamesnot enough data
Richard Cohen + Frank Petrilli4151% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Getler
126W–74L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.53
Greg Leeds
66W–46L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Dan Raz
12W–5L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Dan Siegel
40W–37L career · type A · 7 lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
David Lerer
22W–29L career · 5 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64
Fong Chin
14W–27L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Frank Petrilli
27W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Howard Weidner
22W–44L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
John Duval
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kenneth Kirshbaum
22W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Raymond Schaeffer
23W–17L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Cohen
88W–51L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Robert McCoach
31W–18L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.