Teams

McAra- Good Gravy

2022 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.83 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Suzie Glenn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Tami McAra
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.36
Michele Snyder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2022-08-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesTami McAra / Michele Snyder vs Hillary Ostlund / Kaie Wellman7-5, 6-4
2022-07-28Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichele Snyder / Suzie Glenn vs Aleina Tanabe / Kathryn Stockbower6-4, 6-0
2022-07-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesSuzie Glenn / Erin Hill vs Nenette Olson / Theresa Mallari6-3, 6-4
2022-07-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Snyder / Erin Hill vs Kaie Wellman / Hillary Ostlund6-3, 6-3
2022-06-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSuzie Glenn / Tami McAra vs Jennifer Tran / Shanay Goddard5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesTami McAra / Erin Hill vs Christy Strange / Courtney Storrs3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichele Snyder / Tami McAra vs Mary Hlady / Lynne Gaerisch6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesTami McAra / Suzie Glenn vs Michele Beaman / Lori Middleton6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Suzie Glenn
47W–28L career
not enough data
4
Tami McAra
148W–117L career
6%94%0%
3.63
3.5
Michele Snyder
149W–123L career
0%97%2%
3.36

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.