Teams

ORANGE-USTA Campus-Monge

2022 Orange · Seminole Combo 50 & Over-Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.60 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Seminole Combo 50 & Over-Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Kelli Forgione
published 4
3.60
Alida Astudillo
published 4
3.33
Yardise Jones
published 3.5
3.31
Sanja Radmanovic
published
3.23
Jaqueline Pelliccia
published 3.5
3.13
Silvia Landgraf
published
3.07
Judith Melendez
published
3.05
Leticia Monge
published
2.91
Gail Burr
published 3
Milagro Rubio
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelli Forgione + Yardise Jones5160% gamesnot enough data
Jaqueline Pelliccia + Yardise Jones3254% gamesnot enough data
Leticia Monge + Silvia Landgraf033 matchesnot enough data
Judith Melendez + Alida Astudillo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kelli Forgione
237W–104L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Alida Astudillo
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
3.5
Yardise Jones
142W–78L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Sanja Radmanovic
14W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Jaqueline Pelliccia
67W–53L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Silvia Landgraf
12W–22L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
Judith Melendez
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
Leticia Monge
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Gail Burr
55W–55L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%23%
2.91
Milagro Rubio
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.