Teams

GEPTA/Adult 5.0M/Uraga/CCC#2

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

11 players · average NTRP 4.88 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesTravis Fortune / Andres Morales vs Sergio Miguel Acosta / Emanuel Llamas7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesErick Torres / Andres Morales vs Vedran Vidovic / Adrian Guevara6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-03-30vs GEPTA/Vidovic/Adult 18 & over/5.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesMateo Cisneros / Andres Morales vs Tony Magana / Vedran Vidovic6-7, 6-7
2025-03-23Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAlvaro Dominguez vs Emmanuel Raux3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Vidovic/Adult 18 & over/5.0M712048143
2GEPTA/Adult 5.0M/Uraga/CCC#21742042274

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alvaro Dominguez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
Andres Morales
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
Connor Witty
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 5
4.08
Chris Missirian
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 4.5
Erick Torres
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Gustavo Ganem
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
ISAAC GABRIEL ROYVAL-LARA
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Juan Uraga
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Mateo Cisneros
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 9% · published
Travis Fortune
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Ulrich Delafuente
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erick Torres + Ulrich Delafuente4161% gamesnot enough data
Erick Torres + Gustavo Ganem213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alvaro Dominguez
4W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
5
Andres Morales
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Connor Witty
6W–5L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Chris Missirian
46W–65L career · 23 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.08
Erick Torres
43W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gustavo Ganem
16W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
ISAAC GABRIEL ROYVAL-LARA
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Juan Uraga
89W–29L career · 28 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mateo Cisneros
43W–14L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Travis Fortune
17W–9L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ulrich Delafuente
61W–25L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.