Teams

DaRosso - Matty's Baddies 9.5MX

2025 Howard Combo Mixed · Howard Combo Mixed 9.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-10-15vs Malaki - Faulty LogicLost 03
L#1 DoublesLukas Sanidas / Kelly Dennis vs Matthew O'Connor / Sarah Stearman4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJake Lazer / Rachel Martinez vs Alejandra Sandoval / Marek Slojewski4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChristen Harsha / Randy Resnik vs Conrad Decressin / Marta Perez Mur3-6, 0-6
2025-10-15vs Malaki - Faulty LogicLost 02
L#1 DoublesMatthew DaRosso / Kaitlyn Heo vs Sam Lieber / Marianne Lee3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJake Lazer / Julie Lazer vs Alejandra Sandoval / Anirudh Poruri6-7, 3-6
2025-10-07vs HocoCha9.5MXWon 21
W#1 DoublesRandy Resnik / Kaitlyn Heo vs Liviu Carare / Elizabeth Larson7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJake Lazer / Julie Lazer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLukas Sanidas / Christen Harsha vs Austin Blake / Irene Chen0-6, 0-6
2025-09-30vs HocoCha9.5MXSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRichard Abruscato / Lauren Gurney vs Henry Cha / Meghan Damico4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLukas Sanidas / Rachel Martinez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-14vs HocoCha9.5MXSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMatthew DaRosso / Kelly Dennis vs Matthew Geppi / Elizabeth Larson7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJulie Lazer / Richard Abruscato vs Mehrban Iranshad / Irene Chen6-7, 1-6
2025-09-10vs Malaki - Faulty LogicLost 01
L#1 DoublesMatthew DaRosso / Kaitlyn Heo vs Alejandra Sandoval / Marek Slojewski6-7, 1-6
2025-08-27vs HocoCha9.5MXLost 02
L#1 DoublesMatthew DaRosso / Christen Harsha vs Koby Bonta / Meghan Damico6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMitchell Furst / Kaitlyn Heo vs Anne Tobin / Mehrban Iranshad1-6, 0-6
2025-08-21vs Malaki - Faulty LogicLost 02
L#1 DoublesJake Lazer / Julie Lazer vs Kun Teng TCHE / Sarah Stearman5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew DaRosso / Rachel Martinez vs Stephanie Cohen / Rodrigo Pedraza2-6, 6-7
2025-08-13vs HocoCha9.5MXLost 02
L#1 DoublesJake Lazer / Julie Lazer vs Leonard Tetteh / Anne Tobin3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Abruscato / Christen Harsha vs Heather Herman / Charlie Herman2-6, 2-6
2025-08-10vs Malaki - Faulty LogicLost 03
L#1 DoublesMatthew DaRosso / Kelly Dennis vs Ting Pei Chang / Iosua Malaki2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMitchell Furst / Kaitlyn Heo vs Kun Teng TCHE / Stephanie Cohen5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRandy Resnik / Lauren Gurney vs Marta Perez Mur / Frederic Colas7-5, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Combo Mixed 9.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.33 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.68
Kaitlyn Heo
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.58
Christen Harsha
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.46
Jake Lazer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.44
Julie Lazer
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.35
Randy Resnik
published
4.32
Lauren Gurney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.28
Rachel Martinez
published
4.26
Kelly Dennis
published
4.13
Lukas Sanidas
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.10
Mitchell Furst
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
4.09
Matthew DaRosso
usually #1 Doubles 69%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 4
Richard Abruscato
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Lazer + Mitchell Furst81447% games−17.1% vs expected
Jake Lazer + Julie Lazer2545% gamesnot enough data
Matthew DaRosso + Lauren Gurney134 matchesnot enough data
Randy Resnik + Kelly Dennis213 matchesnot enough data
Kaitlyn Heo + Mitchell Furst033 matchesnot enough data
Kaitlyn Heo + Matthew DaRosso033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Kaitlyn Heo
128W–63L career · 5 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.68
5
Christen Harsha
480W–135L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.58
4.5
Jake Lazer
13W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
4.46
4.5
Julie Lazer
29W–29L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
4.44
Randy Resnik
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
4.35
4.5
Lauren Gurney
11W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
Rachel Martinez
26W–23L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
Kelly Dennis
19W–17L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Lukas Sanidas
142W–110L career · 7 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
4.13
4
Mitchell Furst
21W–29L career · type S · 6 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
4.10
4
Matthew DaRosso
30W–38L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
4.09
Richard Abruscato
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.