Teams

Hasty - Highland CC

2022 Sandhills Adult 40 & over · 3.5 Adult Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-04-27vs Masotti - Pinehurst No. 9Won 10
W#2 DoublesKim Hasty / Emily Morgan vs Deborah Masotti / Carolyn Voltz6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-03-26vs Aldridge- Lawn & TennisWon 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Morgan / Kim Hasty vs Amity Aldridge / Megan Hunt6-4, 7-5
2022-03-02vs Masotti - Pinehurst No. 9Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKim Hasty / Karen Rogers vs Theresa Roach / Susi Tarvis6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Rosemary McLean
published
3.70
Susan Edmonds
published
3.46
Caroline Parks
published 3.5
3.38
Katherine Armstrong
published
3.35
Kim Hasty
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Dawn Dixon
published 3.5
3.15
Marion Bryan
published
3.12
Candee Bryan
published 3.5
Carlye Pleasant
published
Lisa Maher
published
Sandra Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marion Bryan + Susan Edmonds134 matchesnot enough data
Susan Edmonds + Kim Hasty224 matchesnot enough data
Kim Hasty + Dawn Dixon213 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Dixon + Rosemary McLean213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rosemary McLean
16W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Susan Edmonds
34W–30L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Caroline Parks
33W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
Katherine Armstrong
25W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Kim Hasty
148W–106L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Dawn Dixon
33W–30L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Marion Bryan
18W–27L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Candee Bryan
5W–15L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Carlye Pleasant
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Maher
10W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandra Jones
27W–27L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.