Teams

North Ranch Racketeers

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Men 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.43 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-01-25vs SH SpartansLost 13
L#1 DoublesAdrian Apodaca / Michael Lessick vs Michael Mantai / Fred Cohen1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSean Stuart vs Francois Odienne3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJason Brownell / Bill Sutman vs John Dunlop / Alejandro Villalobos6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGreg Augustine / Larry Hurwitz vs Talal Ansari / Chuck Mathews3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Michael Lessick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Bill Sutman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Arkadi Chines
published 3.5
3.27
Adam Targum
published 3.5
3.23
Adrian Apodaca
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Brian Niehaus
published 3.5
3.18
Mark Swedelson
published
3.10
John Lyon
published
3.07
Greg Augustine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.05
Sean Stuart
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.04
Ali Motamedi
published 3.5
2.96
Larry Hurwitz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jason Brownell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adrian Apodaca + Adam Targum7347% games+4.5% vs expected
Adrian Apodaca + Arkadi Chines3254% gamesnot enough data
Adrian Apodaca + Ali Motamedi033 matchesnot enough data
John Lyon + Greg Augustine123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Lessick
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Bill Sutman
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Arkadi Chines
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Adam Targum
19W–17L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Adrian Apodaca
10W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Brian Niehaus
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Mark Swedelson
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
John Lyon
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Greg Augustine
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07
Sean Stuart
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Ali Motamedi
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Larry Hurwitz
3W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.96
Jason Brownell
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.