Teams

Game, Set, Masks

2021 Baltimore Mixed 18 & Over · Baltimore Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-04-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMerve Gurlu / Rongfeng Li vs Lizzy Sweeney / Derek Black6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2021-04-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Apanius / Merve Gurlu vs Daniel Hill / Kim Daniels3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-04-10vs Show Your LoveSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichael Apanius / Merve Gurlu vs Rajesh Jari / Kristin Seidl6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRongfeng Li / Tracy Flaherty vs Matthew Thanner / Valerie Thanner5-7, 6-7
2021-03-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesTracy Flaherty / Rongfeng Li vs Stacey Hardin / Darren Sweeney6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2021-03-20vs Turner-Hill BTP IISplit 11
W#1 DoublesMerve Gurlu / Rongfeng Li vs Doug Nichols / Christine Hammann6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMichael Apanius / Tracy Flaherty vs Ann-Marie Chouinard / Roger Chouinard6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2021-03-13vs Show Your LoveSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRongfeng Li / Elizabeth Buxton vs Leo McCafferty / Lynette Pinhey3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeannie Milio / Michael Apanius vs Matthew Thanner / Valerie Thanner5-7, 2-6
2021-03-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesMerve Gurlu / Michael Apanius vs Stacey Hardin / Patrick Schoenwetter6-3, 7-5
2021-02-27vs Turner-Hill BTP IIWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Buxton / Rongfeng Li vs Carl Strozyk / Cynthia Miller7-5, 6-2
2021-02-21vs Team HillendaleWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Apanius / Jeannie Milio vs Gabrielle Hart / Matthew James1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Buxton / Rongfeng Li vs Ashling Pollard / David Cadigan7-5, 6-1
2021-02-19vs Show Your LoveWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Apanius / Elizabeth Buxton vs Rajesh Jari / Kristin Seidl6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Baltimore Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Michael Apanius
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.68
Andy Bertell
published 4
3.44
Jessica Walsh
published
3.31
Tracy Flaherty
published
3.21
Kevin Foehrkolb
published 3.5
3.09
Rongfeng Li
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michael Apanius
74W–51L career · 7 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Andy Bertell
5W–7L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
Jessica Walsh
13W–9L career · no lines in 2021
69%31%<1%
3.44
Tracy Flaherty
12W–19L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Kevin Foehrkolb
50W–90L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Rongfeng Li
120W–164L career · 7 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.