Teams

Beerman - K. Neighbors

2024 Polk Combo 18 & Over Spring · 5.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-10vs Polk/Clark/18&Over5.5WWon 10
W#2 DoublesTori Hogg / Ginger Davis vs Courtney Larson / Hilary Crenshaw6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGinger Davis / Kelly Neighbors vs Kim Schmucker / Stephanie Barron7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBailey Pacheco / Rose Coulton vs Jan Hyman / Brandy Noel6-2, 7-6
2024-05-06vs Grasslands - K. IngleWon 10
W#2 DoublesCourtney Philpot / Kelly Neighbors vs Catherine Futch / Tracey Ritter6-4, 7-5
2024-04-29vs WH City Tennis - V. BarfieldLost 01
L#1 DoublesDenisse Riddle / Rose Coulton vs Karen Evans / Brittany Rutherford6-7, 0-6
2024-04-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesCourtney Jones / Ginger Davis vs Paxtan Keller / Emily Vickers6-2, 6-1
2024-04-15vs Polk/Clark/18&Over5.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesTina Marcewicz / Bailey Pacheco vs Brittany Craig / Courtney Phillips4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Neighbors / Rose Coulton vs Ashley Bailey / Amy Evans1-6, 6-7
2024-04-08vs Risky Players (WH City) - J. PayneLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Neighbors / Ginger Davis vs Stephanie Barron / Kim Schmucker4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Ginger Davis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
2.87
Tina Marcewicz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Rose Coulton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.75
Courtney Philpot
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Regina Espitia
published
2.57
Julie Goodwin
published
Tori Hogg
published
Wendy Delgado
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney Philpot + Tina Marcewicz192249% games+15.1% vs expected
Rose Coulton + Courtney Philpot81050% games−6.7% vs expected
Rose Coulton + Tina Marcewicz1740% games−10.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ginger Davis
113W–97L career · 10 lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Tina Marcewicz
110W–80L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Rose Coulton
110W–109L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Courtney Philpot
79W–74L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
2.75
Regina Espitia
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.67
Julie Goodwin
6W–21L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
2.57
Tori Hogg
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Wendy Delgado
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.