Teams

Pinellas/Bryan/40&Over3.0W

2025 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.0 W Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-01vs Countryside OverservedWon 31
W#1 DoublesCatherine Mueller / Veronica Sullivan vs Maresol Wehner / Tammy Miller3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesPamela Couchenour vs Chloe Wiard6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Aliak / Melissa Bryan vs Amy Lovett Dunn / Frances Skinner6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPatricia Calhoun / Bethany Bushea vs Mary Miller / Melissa Weible6-1, 6-3
2025-05-24vs Innisbrook HidalgoWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatricia Aliak / Melissa Bryan vs Christie Rock / Darienne Hidalgo6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesPamela Couchenour vs Lisa Connolly7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatricia Calhoun / Holly Richardson vs Cassandra Pauley / Marla Gold6-3, 7-6
2025-05-03vs Seminole Lake Dsa 3.0 WWon 21
L#1 DoublesPatricia Aliak / Patricia Smith vs Emily Corbett / Celeste Rekieta4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Bryan / Veronica Sullivan vs Inna Rand / Jennifer Anderson6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPamela Couchenour / Holly Richardson vs Jessica Spravaka / Marianne Banales6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Veronica Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Pamela Couchenour
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Melissa Bryan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Patricia Aliak
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Patricia Calhoun
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Catherine Mueller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Teena Augostino
published
Bethany Bushea
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Mary George
published
2.48
Heidy Rodriguez
published
Paula Kastenson
published
Stephanie Coleman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Bryan + Patricia Aliak314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Veronica Sullivan
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Pamela Couchenour
22W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Melissa Bryan
29W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Patricia Aliak
21W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Patricia Calhoun
12W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Catherine Mueller
26W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Teena Augostino
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Bethany Bushea
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary George
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Heidy Rodriguez
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
Paula Kastenson
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Coleman
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.