Teams

OC Irvine- Heritage Park- Mouttapa

2024 Adult Capstone League · Women's 5.0 Plus Capstone

17 players · average NTRP 4.78 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-04-14vs OC Los Cab - Tracy Sun1Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDanielle D'Amico / Jinna Johnson vs Debbie Spence-Nasim / Betsy Purpura0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Char / Laura McManus vs Christen Bartelt / Page Bartelt3-6, 1-6
2024-04-07vs OC Los Cab - Tracy Sun1Split 11
L#1 DoublesDeidre Beckley / Trina Eggers vs Christen Bartelt / Page Bartelt3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDanielle D'Amico / Jena Roghair vs Connie Espina / Natalie Hill4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-03-24vs OC Los Cab - Tracy Sun1Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJoey Paynter / Danielle D'Amico vs Amanda Parson Siegel / Debbie Spence-Nasim1-6, 2-6
2024-03-03vs OC Los Cab - Tracy Sun1Split 11
L#1 DoublesJena Roghair / Danielle D'Amico vs Betsy Purpura / Kathy Archibald3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTrina Eggers / Deidre Beckley vs Natalie Hill / Meghan Ball6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-02-25vs OC Los Cab - Tracy Sun1Split 11
L#1 DoublesDeidre Beckley / Trina Eggers vs Connie Espina / Meghan Ball2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichele Mouttapa / Jinna Johnson vs Lajla Feichter / Tracy Harris6-1, 6-2
2024-02-18vs OC Los Cab - Tracy Sun1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesValerie Tan / Karen Char vs Quynh Le / Eleanor Hammargren3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichele Mouttapa / Anja Clarke vs Kathryn Settles / Isabelle Benoit0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Nicholson / Laura McManus vs Kathy Archibald / Natalie Hill3-6, 1-6
2024-02-11vs OC Los Cab - Tracy Sun1Lost 12
L#1 DoublesValerie Tan / Deidre Beckley vs Betsy Purpura / Isabelle Benoit0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDanielle D'Amico / Jena Roghair vs Kathy Archibald / Eleanor Hammargren3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMelissa Rosenthal / Karen Char vs Farrah Northcott / Amy Caldwell6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-02-04vs OC Los Cab - Tracy Sun1Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Beindorf / Trina Eggers vs Amanda Parson Siegel / Kathryn Settles3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichele Mouttapa / Kristina McKee vs Farrah Northcott / Denise Beaufort3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 5.0 Plus Capstone have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.50 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.92
Anja Clarke
published 5
4.73
Deidre Beckley
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.67
Laura Ruben
published
4.65
Laura McManus
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.61
Jennifer Beindorf
published
4.54
Karen Char
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.50
Trina Eggers
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.49
Erica Smalley
published 4.5
4.47
Danielle D'Amico
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.46
Jinna Johnson
published
4.43
Michele Mouttapa
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.39
Melissa Rosenthal
published
4.31
Valerie Tan
published
4.30
Dana Kim
published 4.5
4.09
Kristina McKee
published
Jena Roghair
published
So-Young Walsh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deidre Beckley + Trina Eggers5650% gamesnot enough data
Laura McManus + Karen Char4154% gamesnot enough data
Michele Mouttapa + Erica Smalley404 matchesnot enough data
Michele Mouttapa + Karen Char314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Beindorf + Laura McManus213 matchesnot enough data
Karen Char + Melissa Rosenthal033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Anja Clarke
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.92
5
Deidre Beckley
76W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.73
Laura Ruben
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%12%88%
4.67
5
Laura McManus
107W–68L career · 2 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.65
Jennifer Beindorf
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.61
5
Karen Char
225W–84L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.54
5
Trina Eggers
33W–45L career · 4 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.50
4.5
Erica Smalley
109W–64L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
4.49
4.5
Danielle D'Amico
91W–45L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
4.47
Jinna Johnson
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.46
4.5
Michele Mouttapa
125W–80L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
4.43
Melissa Rosenthal
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.39
Valerie Tan
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.31
4.5
Dana Kim
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.30
Kristina McKee
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
4.09
Jena Roghair
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
So-Young Walsh
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.