Teams

OC LLW NBTC - Gino - Sat1

OC Winter Team Singles · OC Men 4.5

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-26vs OC Palisades - AlanWon 21
W#1 SinglesGino Aielli vs Gregory Little6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAnthony Wright vs Tom Courtney6-2, 6-0
L#3 SinglesDan Rodrigues vs Jeffrey Fracalosy5-7, 4-6
2026-04-25vs OC Newport BluffsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAnthony Wright vs Luca Roth3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesGino Aielli vs Conner Ueberroth6-2, 6-3
2026-04-04vs OC Newport BluffsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesGino Aielli vs Darren Chuang2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesDaryl Lowenstein vs Kyle Thompson6-2, 3-4
2026-03-21vs OC Palisades - AlanWon 10
W#2 SinglesDaniel Tat vs Ryan Hellmers6-2, 7-5
2026-03-14vs OC Newport BluffsSplit 11
L#2 SinglesDaryl Lowenstein vs Darren Chuang3-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesGino Aielli vs Christopher Gates7-5, 6-1
2026-02-28vs OC Palisades - AlanWon 30
W#1 SinglesAnthony Wright vs Matthew Brainard6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesDaniel Tat vs Harry Packer6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesScott Frick vs Jeffrey Fracalosy6-2, 6-2
2026-02-21vs OC Newport BluffsLost 12
W#1 SinglesScott Tiernan vs Ryan Tran3-5
L#2 SinglesGino Aielli vs Dion Jaffee1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesDan Rodrigues vs Darren Chuang0-6, 1-6
2026-02-07vs OC Palisades - AlanWon 21
W#1 SinglesAnthony Wright vs Derek Hsu6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDaryl Lowenstein vs Bryson Eastwood6-7, 2-6
W#3 SinglesDan Rodrigues vs Harry Packer6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · OC Men 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OC Newport Bluffs5113510101
2OC LLW NBTC - Gino - Sat15315920183
3OC Palisades - Alan0621632205

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Anthony Wright
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.28
Daniel Tat
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.20
Daryl Lowenstein
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Gino Aielli
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
4.12
Scott Tiernan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.02
Dan Rodrigues
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Scott Frick
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anthony Wright
4W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Daniel Tat
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Daryl Lowenstein
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
4.20
Gino Aielli
10W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
Scott Tiernan
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
19%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Dan Rodrigues
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
4.02
Scott Frick
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.