Teams

Tie Breakers

2025 Mixed 18 and Over League · 9.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.08 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-09vs Mix It Up KRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatie Yamamoto / Royce Moux vs Katelyn Sweeney Ching / Richard Gregory4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPraphaporn Downing / Remii Tanaka vs Kimi Gabbard / Bhakti Gabbard6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Day / Ryan Hurley vs Jessica Nishikawa / Jared Carstenn1-6, 5-7
2025-03-02vs Drink-Play-Eat-RepeatWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Kobayakawa / Jackson Fong vs Tam Nguyen / Courtnay Nguyen6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRemii Tanaka / Reina Visaya vs Leslie Fujitani / Jace Akagi-Okuma2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesPaul Baessler / Stacey Merrick vs Marc Cayetano / Berylin Lau7-6, 6-4
2025-02-23vs Ace Ace In Your FaceLost 12
L#1 DoublesVivian Wen / Royce Moux vs Sarah Kukino / Evan Hirata4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Day / Ryan Hurley vs Akimi Kifune / Cody Lau6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPraphaporn Downing / Paul Baessler vs Shaina Yeung / Zachary-Alan Kim2-6, 3-6
2025-02-16vs Manoa MastersLost 03
L#1 DoublesRemii Tanaka / Aureana Wong vs Kurt Irvine / Peggy Watanabe2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMaximus Hui / Praphaporn Downing vs Travis Yoshimoto / Ean Smith1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBryan Lum / Stacey Merrick vs Albert Cook / Junko Kadomatsu3-6, 3-6
2025-02-02vs Mix It Up KRCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJackson Fong / Melissa Kobayakawa vs Shannon Rogers / Tim Kelley6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRyan Hurley / Jennifer Day vs Kimi Gabbard / Bhakti Gabbard1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPaul Baessler / Mari Tadaki vs Keri Gall / Todd Hall6-2, 6-3
2025-01-26vs Drink-Play-Eat-RepeatLost 12
L#1 DoublesMari Tadaki / Bryan Lum vs Gregory Zukeran / Sarah Ikioka4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMaximus Hui / Katie Yamamoto vs Leslie Fujitani / Tyler Makabe7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesVivian Wen / Royce Moux vs Marc Cayetano / Berylin Lau6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-01-19vs Ace Ace In Your FaceLost 12
L#1 DoublesAureana Wong / Paul Baessler vs Akimi Kifune / Cody Lau3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesReina Visaya / Maximus Hui vs Hanha Youn / Zachary-Alan Kim7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJennifer Day / Bryan Lum vs Caasi Nakasone / Harold Shimono0-6, 3-6
2025-01-12vs Manoa MastersLost 03
L#1 DoublesJackson Fong / Aureana Wong vs Travis Yoshimoto / Skye Yonehara1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRemii Tanaka / Stacey Merrick vs Jeff Gaddi / Peggy Watanabe2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBryan Lum / Reina Visaya vs Kurt Irvine / Kara Shibata6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Drink-Play-Eat-Repeat35121228236
2Mix It Up KRC3581633238
3Tie Breakers2671736259

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.65
Melissa Kobayakawa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.42
Reina Visaya
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.35
Mari Tadaki
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.31
Aureana Wong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.20
Jennifer Day
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
4.09
Stacey Merrick
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.05
Maximus Hui
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.99
Vivian Wen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.95
Remii Tanaka
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.90
Praphaporn Downing
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.88
Jackson Fong
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.80
Ryan Hurley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Katie Yamamoto
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Bryan Lum
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
Royce Moux
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jackson Fong + Melissa Kobayakawa5257% gamesnot enough data
Ryan Hurley + Jennifer Day123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Kobayakawa
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.65
4.5
Reina Visaya
81W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
4.42
4.5
Mari Tadaki
32W–21L career · type S · 6 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
4.35
4.5
Aureana Wong
48W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
Jennifer Day
23W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
Stacey Merrick
117W–64L career · 3 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
4.09
Maximus Hui
16W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
4.05
Vivian Wen
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
Remii Tanaka
48W–44L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.95
Praphaporn Downing
79W–100L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.90
Jackson Fong
56W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
Ryan Hurley
21W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
3.5
Katie Yamamoto
64W–27L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.63
3.5
Bryan Lum
42W–27L career · type A · 13 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Royce Moux
8W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.