Teams

Em.Perry18A

2026 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 5.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 5.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-17vs Da.Wilder18AWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Moler Glass / Beatrice Faureng vs Paula Fernandez-Pita / Aline Laborde6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesNena Marks vs Leslie Boesch6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBonnie Stabler / Lauren Laughton vs Brandy Kmiec / Shelly Kirkpatrick6-0, 7-5
2026-05-03vs El.Hodges18ALost 12
W#1 DoublesNena Marks / Jeni Burnette vs Jennifer Hiller / Heather Remley6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAngela Graf vs Elizabeth Hodges0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMacY Fisher / Anne Frautschi vs Madeline Brown / Hannah Dahlem4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-04-26vs Da.Wilder18AWon 21
W#1 DoublesNeal Goodwin / Sarah Barnhill vs Danielle Wilder / Julia Howard6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesBonnie Stabler vs Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Speicher / Anne Frautschi vs Paula Fernandez-Pita / Aline Laborde0-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-04-25vs Da.Wilder18AWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Speicher / MacY Fisher vs Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade / Danielle Wilder5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNena Marks vs Leslie Boesch6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNeal Goodwin / Sarah Barnhill vs Shelly Kirkpatrick / Brandy Kmiec6-1, 6-2
2026-04-12vs El.Hodges18ALost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Speicher / Angela Graf vs Madeline Brown / Jennifer Hiller2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBonnie Stabler vs Elizabeth Hodges3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Perry / Alice Stubbs vs Jennifer McEntee / Heather Remley1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-22vs El.Hodges18AWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeni Burnette / Beatrice Faureng vs Anastasiya Manet / Madeline Brown4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNena Marks vs Angelina Neiberger6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEmily Perry / Alice Stubbs vs Mary-Katherine Martin / Paula Collado Cordon6-3, 6-0
2026-03-15vs Da.Wilder18AWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Perry / Jeni Burnette vs Laura Alarcon Kerner / Danielle Wilder6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Speicher vs Leslie Boesch1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Barnhill / Kelly Moler Glass vs Paula Fernandez-Pita / Brandy Kmiec6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-01vs El.Hodges18ALost 12
W#1 DoublesJeni Burnette / Beatrice Faureng vs Elizabeth Hodges / Jennifer Hiller6-1, 7-6
L#1 SinglesLauren Laughton vs Tanita Tedamrongwanish4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Perry / Alice Stubbs vs Laura Alvarez / Anastasiya Manet5-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 5.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Em.Perry18A5316821186
2El.Hodges18A53141023177
3Da.Wilder18A2661839257

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.65 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.96
Jeni Burnette
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.87
Nena Marks
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.79
Alice Stubbs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.79
Beatrice Faureng
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
Angela Graf
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 5
4.73
Anne Frautschi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.64
Bonnie Stabler
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.63
Kelly Moler Glass
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.61
Emily Perry
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.60
Sarah Barnhill
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.59
Lauren Laughton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.54
Elizabeth Speicher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.39
Neal Goodwin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.26
MacY Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Rothschild
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeni Burnette + Emily Perry7266% games+1.8% vs expected
Elizabeth Speicher + Neal Goodwin134 matchesnot enough data
Emily Perry + Alice Stubbs314 matchesnot enough data
Nena Marks + Sarah Barnhill303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Jeni Burnette
52W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.96
5
Nena Marks
89W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.87
5
Alice Stubbs
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.79
5
Beatrice Faureng
10W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.79
5
Angela Graf
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
5
Anne Frautschi
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.73
5
Bonnie Stabler
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.64
5
Kelly Moler Glass
69W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.63
Emily Perry
14W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.61
Sarah Barnhill
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.60
Lauren Laughton
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.59
Elizabeth Speicher
12W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.54
Neal Goodwin
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.39
MacY Fisher
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.26
Karen Rothschild
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.