Teams

Lata18/Rogers/TS

2025 Adult 18 & Over - USTA · Adult Women - 3.0 - Night

12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-28vs LATA18/Leary/LCTCLost 14
L#1 DoublesMadison Crossland / Steffi Johnson vs Kaliska Vazquez / Heather Pate3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Zhao vs Maira Trimble0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAlyssa Fencel / Laurin Beckroge vs Anna Mills Cox / Lindsay Copelan4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesWylie Walker vs Anne Spencer Muncy6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTara Rogers / Jamie Fite vs Patty Spires / Tracie Ifkovits0-6, 1-6
2025-03-16vs LATA18/Leary/LCTCLost 04
L#1 DoublesLaurin Beckroge / Madison Crossland vs Anna Leary / Kaliska Vazquez3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSteffi Johnson / Alyssa Fencel vs Abbey Culvern / Spencer Robinson4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesSarah Zhao vs Michelle Connor6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHeather Whitley / Carolyn Benzon vs Lindsay Copelan / Tracie Ifkovits3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 3.0 - Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Sarah Zhao
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.56
Jamie Fite
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Alyssa Fencel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.46
Tara Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Heather Whitley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Sonya Head
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Carolyn Benzon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Cindy Smith
published 2.5
Laurin Beckroge
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Madison Crossland
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Steffi Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Wylie Walker
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tara Rogers + Jamie Fite3746% games+7.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Zhao
14W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Jamie Fite
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
2.5
Alyssa Fencel
9W–8L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%54%46%
2.49
Tara Rogers
9W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
0%60%40%
2.46
Heather Whitley
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.44
Sonya Head
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
2.33
2.5
Carolyn Benzon
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Cindy Smith
2W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laurin Beckroge
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Madison Crossland
9W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steffi Johnson
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wylie Walker
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.