Teams

LTC RED

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.08 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-30vs RHCC GREENLost 05
L#1 DoublesJudith McKinney / Erika Vincent vs Jody Alderman / Maria Lucas7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKristen Philbrook vs Amelia Hendrickson2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrigid McClaire / Kristine O'Brien vs Kimberly Salazar Suman / Jessica Tsuo3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesBecky Adams vs Melissa Pugh4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBetsy Duryea / Karen Noreyko vs Jennifer Curtis-Jones / Terri Lombardi1-6, 3-6
2022-05-23vs HIW MAROONSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJennifer Kramer / Erika Vincent vs Amanda Fuller Wellman / Rhonda Wilson6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesBecky Adams vs Kimberly Easton6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Noreyko / Mary Johanson vs Madeline Schymanski / Kelly Murphy5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKristen Philbrook / Betsy Duryea vs Wendy Vance / Jessica Fleck6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2022-05-16vs NJ NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Johanson / Erika Vincent vs Barbara Westfall / Gail Berkery6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBecky Adams vs Rose Foster6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrigid McClaire / Betsy Duryea vs Mary Rose Wilder / Kelly Stratman0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-05-13vs BP REDLost 23
L#1 DoublesJudith McKinney / Jennifer Kramer vs Emily Adams / Mara Orchard1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristen Philbrook vs Yun Li3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrigid McClaire / Erika Vincent vs Melanie Escobar / Everett Johnson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKristine O'Brien vs Erin Heltshe0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Noreyko / Mary Johanson vs Laura Read / Kira Waite7-6, 6-4
2022-05-09vs MC NAVYWon 41
W#1 DoublesMary Johanson / Judith McKinney vs Kirsten Sharer / Donna Marie Gilner6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKristen Philbrook vs Ciel Lawrence1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBrigid McClaire / Kristine O'Brien vs Betty Evans / Luann Mcclure6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesBecky Adams vs Jennifer Arnold6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBetsy Duryea / Jennifer Kramer vs Angela Fulcher / Jackie Greiner3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-04-25vs RHCC GREENLost 14
L#1 DoublesJudith McKinney / Mary Johanson vs Amelia Hendrickson / Kimberly Salazar Suman3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBecky Adams vs Melissa Pugh4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrigid McClaire / Jennifer Kramer vs Maria Lucas / Jody Alderman1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesErika Vincent vs Carla Grumann6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKaren Noreyko / Kristine O'Brien vs Jennifer Curtis-Jones / Terri Lombardi1-6, 1-6
2022-04-18vs HIW MAROONWon 41
W#1 DoublesJudith McKinney / Jennifer Kramer vs Wendy Vance / Rhonda Wilson6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKristen Philbrook vs Jamie Peters7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKaren Noreyko / Liz Hafer vs Kelly Murphy / Madeline Schymanski2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesBecky Adams vs Emily Scarbrough4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErika Vincent / Kristine O'Brien vs Jessica Fleck / Kimberly Easton6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Erika Vincent
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.88
Becky Adams
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.75
Judith McKinney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Brigid McClaire
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Mary Johanson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.56
Kristen Philbrook
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.43
Betsy Duryea
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Karen Noreyko
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Kristine O'Brien
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Liz Hafer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Johanson + Judith McKinney9554% games+8.3% vs expected
Karen Noreyko + Liz Hafer141947% games+1.0% vs expected
Kristine O'Brien + Brigid McClaire2840% games−4.9% vs expected
Betsy Duryea + Kristine O'Brien0631% games−16.6% vs expected
Mary Johanson + Karen Noreyko2342% gamesnot enough data
Betsy Duryea + Erika Vincent404 matchesnot enough data
Karen Noreyko + Kristine O'Brien134 matchesnot enough data
Betsy Duryea + Kristen Philbrook123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Erika Vincent
42W–28L career · 6 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Becky Adams
45W–22L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
Judith McKinney
48W–38L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Brigid McClaire
38W–44L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Mary Johanson
37W–41L career · 5 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Kristen Philbrook
30W–54L career · 5 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Betsy Duryea
35W–36L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
2.43
Karen Noreyko
29W–41L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristine O'Brien
17W–50L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Liz Hafer
24W–32L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.