Teams

Aloha Smash

2024 Tri-One Doubles League · 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.33 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-09-15vs Double FaultsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAkiko Jung / Karen Ng vs Rebekah Morales / Jessica Yuen6-3, 7-6
2024-09-08vs Alley CatsLost 01
L#1 DoublesAkiko Jung / Hitomi Yokoyama vs Diane Nakahodo / Sonavie Ong5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2024-09-07vs Alley OopsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAkiko Jung / Satsuki Morales vs Kathleen Rubio / Debby Shin5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2024-09-01vs Tri DatLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Ng / Hitomi Yokoyama vs Terri Mei / Gayle Hatakeyama1-6, 3-6
2024-08-11vs Double FaultsWon 10
W#1 DoublesHitomi Yokoyama / Kimmy Goldsmith vs Rebekah Morales / Jessica Yuen6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-08-04vs Alley CatsWon 10
W#1 DoublesHitomi Yokoyama / Satsuki Morales vs Sonavie Ong / Pam Wheat6-2, 6-1
2024-07-28vs Tri DatWon 10
W#1 DoublesConnie Doma / Karen Ng vs Jennifer Ostachuk / Anna Lee7-5, 6-4
2024-07-21vs Alley OopsLost 01
L#1 DoublesConnie Doma / Kimmy Goldsmith vs Kathleen Rubio / Debby Shin2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Alley Oops6262442
2Tri Dat6262560
3Aloha Smash5353876
4Double Faults08081698

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Connie Doma
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Hitomi Yokoyama
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Akiko Jung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.89
Satsuki Morales
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Kimmy Goldsmith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Akiko Jung + Hitomi Yokoyama3356% games+10.5% vs expected
Satsuki Morales + Hitomi Yokoyama3645% games+5.2% vs expected
Satsuki Morales + Akiko Jung4445% games+0.6% vs expected
Satsuki Morales + Connie Doma404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Connie Doma
12W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Hitomi Yokoyama
14W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Akiko Jung
11W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
Satsuki Morales
13W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
2.89
3
Kimmy Goldsmith
17W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.