Teams

KY/LOU/DALTON

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & Over LOUISVILLE · 3.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2026-05-16vs KY/LOU/THOMAS/BLACKWon 10
W#3 DoublesWhitney Barnes / Thuy Murphy vs Janet Kanzinger / Lynne Haas6-2, 6-2
2026-05-10vs KY/LOU/BAYLON/HELFRICHSplit 11
W#2 DoublesChristine Montgomery / Thuy Murphy vs Sonja Bareiss / Jen Root6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLindagarde Dalton / Kimberly Polter vs Judette Baylon / Jamie Hancock3-6, 3-6
2026-04-19vs KY/LOU/KWILLIAMS/KHANLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristine Montgomery / Cecelia Bland vs Julie Atkinson / Stephanie Saxton1-6, 3-6
2026-03-08vs KY/LOU/FRENCH/WILSONLost 05
L#1 DoublesLinda Ross / Suzanne Spencer vs MJ Kik / Shannon Kessler2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesYana Feygin vs Elizabeth Goodknight1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMaryjanice Beavin / Sara Rocke vs Catie Wilson / Jen Root2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMichelle Sauer vs Rosmond Dolen2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSophia Mobley / Samantha Oerther vs Robbyn McClain / Lauren Berry0-6, 2-6
2026-03-01vs KY/LOU/SUN/SCHNURRLost 04
L#1 SinglesTaylor Wacker vs Katie Nichols0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Montgomery / Daryl Alfrey vs Andrea Schnurr / Katie Cropper2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMichelle Sauer vs Caroline Mulcahy1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSamantha Oerther / Sara Rocke vs Amanda Williams / Kacy Noltemeyer4-6, 3-6
2026-02-21vs KY/LOU/MEAGHER / SCHARFLost 05
L#1 DoublesChristine Montgomery / Linda Ross vs Jennifer Williams / Amber Thieneman1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesYana Feygin vs Jennifer Fisher0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMaryjanice Beavin / Daryl Alfrey vs Amy Sheehan / Jessica Scheiner6-7, 5-7
L#2 SinglesSamantha Oerther vs Brittany Burt0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Weathers / Lindagarde Dalton vs Emily Coxon / Carley Rutkowske5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-02-15vs KY/LOU/OUTLAW/HOLLANDLost 14
L#1 DoublesKaren Weathers / Hayley Davis vs Erin Grissinger / Katie Sullivan7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMichelle Sauer vs Laura Mahoney0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMechelle Kaufman / Kim Johnson vs Amanda Helfrich / Jina Kang6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesSophia Mobley vs Manasaa Kannan3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSara Rocke / Linda Ross vs Lindsay Brown / Sarah Clevenger7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2026-02-08vs KY/LOU/HARRIS/MASONSplit 22
L#1 DoublesHayley Davis / Christine Montgomery vs Amanda Reasor / Jessica Bethards6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesYana Feygin vs Stephanie Mason0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKim Johnson / Mechelle Kaufman vs Lynn Harris / Kim Orick6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSara Rocke / Daryl Alfrey vs Lisa Marsh / Jane Bruning6-4, 6-0
2026-02-07vs KY/LOU/AGIN/MCGLONESplit 22
W#1 DoublesHayley Davis / Karen Weathers vs Kara Towarnicki / Katie Windhorst6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesYana Feygin vs KC Coakley1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMechelle Kaufman / Kim Johnson vs Brooke Ault / Lilly McGlone6-3, 7-5
L#2 SinglesSophia Mobley vs Melissa Lowe1-6, 3-6
2026-01-18vs KY/LOU/MILLIGAN/CHESSLERWon 32
W#1 DoublesHayley Davis / Mechelle Kaufman vs Katie Esterle / Charlene Chessler6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSophia Mobley vs Christine Shearn6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Montgomery / Mary Smiley vs Angela Leinenbach / Libby Milligan6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesTaylor Wacker vs Ursula Melhuish6-0, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDaryl Alfrey / Kim Johnson vs Beth Bryant / Melissa Webb7-5, 6-2
2026-01-10vs KY/LOU/SCARBROUGHWon 41
W#1 DoublesMechelle Kaufman / Kim Johnson vs Mackenzie White / Noriko Hosoda6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMichelle Sauer vs Namuun Gantumur1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesThuy Murphy / Maryjanice Beavin vs Terri Blose / Tracy Jones6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesYana Feygin vs Kelly Nixon6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDaryl Alfrey / Suzanne Spencer vs Suling Zhang / Robin Scarbrough2-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Thuy Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Karen Weathers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.02
Mechelle Kaufman
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
2.97
Hayley Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Christine Montgomery
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Daryl Alfrey
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.72
Maryjanice Beavin
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.71
Mary Smiley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.59
Sara Rocke
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.50
Lindagarde Dalton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Michelle Sauer
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.32
Yana Feygin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
2.27
Samantha Oerther
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.22
Dayna Thomas
published 3
2.20
Sophia Mobley
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
Suzanne Spencer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Taylor Wacker
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thuy Murphy + Christine Montgomery3251% games−1.8% vs expected
Thuy Murphy + Mechelle Kaufman4457% games−6.9% vs expected
Christine Montgomery + Karen Weathers3452% games−7.8% vs expected
Mechelle Kaufman + Karen Weathers2354% gamesnot enough data
Samantha Oerther + Sara Rocke4162% gamesnot enough data
Daryl Alfrey + Christine Montgomery044 matchesnot enough data
Thuy Murphy + Karen Weathers303 matchesnot enough data
Christine Montgomery + Hayley Davis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thuy Murphy
20W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
Karen Weathers
24W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.13
Mechelle Kaufman
38W–34L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
Hayley Davis
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Christine Montgomery
30W–40L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Daryl Alfrey
8W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Maryjanice Beavin
1W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Mary Smiley
10W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Sara Rocke
18W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%26%74%
2.59
Lindagarde Dalton
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
Michelle Sauer
7W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.36
Yana Feygin
13W–28L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
Samantha Oerther
10W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
3
Dayna Thomas
3W–11L career · no lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
2.22
Sophia Mobley
8W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.20
Suzanne Spencer
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Taylor Wacker
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.