Teams

T2- Chantilly/ Ogilive

2022 Loudoun Adult 18 & Over Women · Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.30 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-20vs T1 - A.Farms/ HunterWon 10
W#2 DoublesHeather Viar / Lori Reed vs Jennifer Hunter / Erin Gorman6-4, 6-4
2022-06-07vs T1 - A.Farms/ HunterWon 10
W#1 SinglesGrete Bravo vs Brenda Clark6-0, 6-1
2022-05-31vs T1 - A.Farms/ HunterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHeather Viar / Jennifer East vs Kay Bransford / Joanne Guerrera2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDana Chladek vs Angie Wong5-7, 5-4
2022-05-26vs T1 - A.Farms/ HunterWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Snyder / Grete Bravo vs Colleen Stoltz / Verna Flemming6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHeather Viar / Vanessa Ogilvie vs Jutta Nohra / Sunghee Jenczewski6-2, 7-5
2022-05-17vs T1 - A.Farms/ HunterWon 10
W#1 SinglesDana Chladek vs Tamara Lindquist7-5, 6-1
2022-05-12vs T1 - A.Farms/ HunterWon 10
W#2 DoublesSangma MacDougald / Christine Becer vs Angie Wong / Blair Reid6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-05-10vs T1 - A.Farms/ HunterWon 10
W#2 DoublesErica Gormley / Linda Carter vs Tamara Lindquist / Erin Gorman3-6, 6-7
2022-05-03vs T1 - A.Farms/ HunterLost 01
L#2 DoublesHeather Viar / Tracey White vs Erin Gorman / Virginia Greenlaw1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Heather Viar
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.23
Christine Becer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.15
Grete Bravo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.07
Jennifer Beets
published
3.67
Dana Chladek
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.64
Jennifer DeCamp
published
3.63
Erica Gormley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.60
Tracey White
published
3.43
Jennifer East
published
3.37
Lori Reed
published
Vanessa Ogilvie
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Heather Viar
239W–145L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
4.24
4.5
Christine Becer
271W–177L career · 1 line in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Grete Bravo
70W–38L career · 2 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.15
Jennifer Beets
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
4.07
4
Dana Chladek
166W–70L career · 6 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
Jennifer DeCamp
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.64
4
Erica Gormley
109W–138L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
Tracey White
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
Jennifer East
15W–15L career · no lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
3.43
Lori Reed
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%0%
3.37
Vanessa Ogilvie
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.