Teams

Ladd/Nashville

2025 Combo 18 & Over - Nashville · 6.5 Men - Tuesday PM

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-16vs Horn/Feyes/NashvilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesPatrick Ainsworth / Ryan Moss vs Connor Horn / Scott Patterson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-09-09vs Horn/Feyes/NashvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Ladd / Damon Reid vs Brian Feyes / Jerry Sims6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGeorge Bailey IV / Ryan Moss vs Joseph Fogarty / Connor Horn5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Knezha / Evans Wellborn vs Matt Cole / Theo Smith0-6, 0-6
2025-09-02vs Horn/Feyes/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Ladd / Damon Reid vs Nicholas Cook / Brian Feyes4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGeorge Bailey IV / Evans Wellborn vs Jerry Sims / Theo Smith0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesScott Burka / Bryan Figler vs Connor Horn / Scott Patterson5-7, 5-7
2025-08-26vs Horn/Feyes/NashvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Ladd / Damon Reid vs Joseph Fogarty / Jerry Sims6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPatrick Ainsworth / Evans Wellborn vs Scott Patterson / Alex Paz2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBryan Figler / Daniel Knezha vs Matt Cole / Nicholas Cook0-6, 3-6
2025-08-19vs Horn/Feyes/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesScott Burka / Bryan Figler vs Brian Feyes / Connor Horn7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPatrick Ainsworth / Ryan Moss vs Scott Patterson / Alex Paz2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Ladd / Damon Reid vs Jerry Sims / Theo Smith6-3, 6-2
2025-08-12vs Horn/Feyes/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatrick Ainsworth / Bryan Figler vs Joseph Fogarty / Scott Patterson6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRyan Moss / Damon Reid vs Matt Cole / Connor Horn4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Knezha / Michael Ladd vs Jerry Sims / Theo Smith3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men - Tuesday PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Damon Reid
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.73
Evans Wellborn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Patrick Ainsworth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Bryan Figler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
George Bailey IV
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Daniel Knezha
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Scott Burka
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Knezha + Evans Wellborn123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Damon Reid
10W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Evans Wellborn
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Patrick Ainsworth
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Bryan Figler
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.69
George Bailey IV
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Daniel Knezha
2W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
Scott Burka
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.