Teams

Marion/Centonze/8.0Mixed55&Over

2025 Marion Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 55 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 4.12 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-08vs Villages ZinkWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiana Royo / Peter Grosshans vs Patty Swanson / Robert Gisriel5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Scott Anthony vs Mime Ichini-Lurie / Jonathan Lurie6-0, 6-1
2025-06-07vs Villages ZinkSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPeter Grosshans / Dina Sapienza vs Patty Swanson / Thomas Gessel3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Grady Grimes vs Robin Zink / Joseph Quigley6-2, 6-2
2025-05-31vs Villages ZinkWon 10
W#2 DoublesCaroline Murray / DONALD CRAWLEY vs Michelle Nathan / Charles Arnold7-6, 7-5
2025-05-25vs Villages ZinkWon 10
W#2 DoublesDiana Royo / Peter Grosshans vs Robin Zink / Joseph Quigley6-2, 6-2
2025-05-18vs Villages ZinkWon 10
W#1 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Peter Grosshans vs Thomas Gessel / Michelle Nathan7-6, 6-4
2025-05-10vs Villages ZinkWon 10
W#2 DoublesDina Sapienza / DONALD CRAWLEY vs Nancy Rushman / Allen Nathan6-1, 6-4
2025-04-27vs Villages ZinkWon 20
W#1 DoublesChris Donahue / Eileen Lombardo vs Michelle Nathan / Joseph Quigley7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDONALD CRAWLEY / Dina Sapienza vs Mime Ichini-Lurie / Jonathan Lurie6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Drae Centonze
published 5
3.96
Diana Royo
published 4
3.89
DONALD CRAWLEY
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Eileen Lombardo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Caroline Murray
published 4
Brad Armagost
published 4
Chris Eversole
published 4
3.69
Kelly Armagost
published
3.66
Peter Grosshans
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.45
Dina Sapienza
published
3.35
Scott Anthony
published
3.28
Ronald Wiese
published
Grady Grimes
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Drae Centonze
102W–22L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.51
4
Diana Royo
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
3.96
4
DONALD CRAWLEY
472W–252L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Eileen Lombardo
304W–158L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Caroline Murray
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Brad Armagost
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Chris Eversole
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Armagost
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Peter Grosshans
148W–114L career · 6 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
Dina Sapienza
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.45
Scott Anthony
17W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Ronald Wiese
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Grady Grimes
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.