Teams

EW-Peak-Tommerup

2025 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-01vs EW - Free AgentsWon 31
L#1 DoublesBrady Tommerup / Duke Dixon vs Kevin Jones / Jeff Judson4-8
W#1 SinglesMichael Khounnala vs N/A8-0
W#2 DoublesShaun Whitney / Marc Mowrer vs Martin Janout / Charles Schulz9-8
W#3 DoublesJeffery Urie / David Robin vs Craig Fager / Mark Jackson8-0
2025-05-31vs EW - Free AgentsWon 30
W#1 DoublesJason Chapman / Jeffery Urie vs Charles Adams / Craig Fager8-2
W#2 DoublesMichael Khounnala / Duke Dixon vs Martin Janout / Doug Conboy8-4
W#3 DoublesCorey DeLeonard / Shaun Whitney vs Mark Jackson / Tim Qualls8-3
2025-05-30vs EW - Free AgentsWon 30
W#1 DoublesCorey DeLeonard / Michael Khounnala vs Martin Janout / Tim Qualls8-5
W#2 DoublesBrady Tommerup / Jason Chapman vs Doug Conboy / Craig Fager8-3
W#3 DoublesMarc Mowrer / David Robin vs Charles Schulz / Kevin Jones8-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-Peak-Tommerup30111144
2EW - Free Agents031111193

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Corey DeLeonard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.26
Michael Khounnala
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Brady Tommerup
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Jason Chapman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.22
Jeffery Urie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.21
Patrick Vichit
usually #1 Singles 89%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 4.5
4.14
David Robin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Duke Dixon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Marc Mowrer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Shaun Whitney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffery Urie + David Robin18862% games+1.2% vs expected
Jason Chapman + Michael Khounnala6552% games−0.6% vs expected
Jason Chapman + Jeffery Urie6263% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Corey DeLeonard
20W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
4.37
4.5
Michael Khounnala
47W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Brady Tommerup
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Jason Chapman
52W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Jeffery Urie
61W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Patrick Vichit
68W–54L career · 9 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
David Robin
74W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
4.14
Duke Dixon
22W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marc Mowrer
6W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shaun Whitney
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.