Teams

Rubben,QTC,SB,55W/3-3.5-4

2022 Shrev-Boss Tri-Level 55 & Over - Women · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Shrev

16 players · average NTRP 3.25 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Tammy Cannon
published
3.75
Tanya McMaster
published
3.58
Carol Matthews
published 4
3.50
Sandra Botzong
published
3.49
Kirita Windham
published
3.47
Samantha Bruscato
published
3.43
Jill McCathran
published
3.31
Rhonda Rubben
published
3.11
Kim Kitchens
published
3.11
Katy Vincent
published
2.98
Tammie Harris
published
2.89
Connie Holoman
published 3
2.88
Dede Plette
published 3
2.66
Beverly Hood
published 3
2.66
Marianne Boston
published
Kim Lucky
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandra Botzong + Kirita Windham123 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Botzong + Carol Matthews123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Cannon
23W–18L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
4.04
Tanya McMaster
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Carol Matthews
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
Sandra Botzong
15W–22L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.50
Kirita Windham
8W–15L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
3.49
Samantha Bruscato
10W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
Jill McCathran
10W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
Rhonda Rubben
57W–33L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Kim Kitchens
24W–23L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Katy Vincent
24W–43L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.11
Tammie Harris
9W–14L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Connie Holoman
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
2.89
3
Dede Plette
22W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Beverly Hood
10W–9L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
Marianne Boston
10W–27L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
Kim Lucky
8W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.