Teams

BBTL40/HardenMcMurtry/SunCity

Adult 40 & Over - USTA · Adult Men - 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-11vs BBTL (A) 3.5M 40 & Over (Ryan)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesJohn Harden vs Dan Nunez6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRichard Pegler / David Streck vs Aaron Callahan / Randy Marcotte2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDonald McCarl / Mitchell Billek vs Mercer Joyner / Christian Cole0-6, 2-6
2026-04-04vs BBTL40/Dwyer/TLCWon 20
W#2 DoublesWilliam Harwood / Chuck Hasenauer vs Everett Dwyer / Richard Schwartz3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSteven Nygren / Dave Bogan vs Murray Steen / Scott Jennings6-3, 6-1
2026-03-21vs BBTL (A) 3.5M 40 & Over (Ryan)Won 31
L#1 DoublesWilliam Harwood / David Streck vs Matthew Haschak / Jeffrey Weldon3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJohn Harden vs Randy Marcotte6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTroy Havens / Ken Hedgecock vs Shane O'Neill / George Knoske6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDonald McCarl / Dave Bogan vs Pat Proano / John Ryan7-5, 6-2
2026-03-14vs BBTL40/Dwyer/TLCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Bell / John Harden vs Mike Cherry / David Fancher6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Beckley / David Streck vs Alan Mock / Richard Schwartz6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWilliam Harwood / Mark McMurtry vs Murray Steen / Daniel Besecker6-1, 6-0
2026-02-28vs BBTL (A) 3.5M 40 & Over (Ryan)Won 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Harden / William Harwood vs Aaron Callahan / Christian Cole6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRichard Pegler / David Streck vs Jeffrey Weldon / Randy Marcotte2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKen Hedgecock / Dave Bogan vs Dan Nunez / Stan Flickinger6-7, 4-6
2026-02-21vs BBTL40/Dwyer/TLCLost 12
L#1 DoublesChuck Hasenauer / Troy Havens vs Mike Cherry / David Fancher4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesWilliam Harwood / Mark McMurtry vs Alan Mock / Patrick White7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMitchell Billek / Alan Chase vs David Riedmayer / Richard Schwartz4-6, 4-6
2026-02-07vs BBTL (A) 3.5M 40 & Over (Ryan)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Bell / Troy Havens vs Jeffrey Weldon / Aaron Callahan5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Beckley / David Streck vs Mercer Joyner / Matthew Haschak2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAlan Chase / Donald McCarl vs Dan Nunez / Ed Pulkinen3-6, 2-6
2026-02-07vs BBTL40/Dwyer/TLCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Harden / Richard Pegler vs Mike Cherry / David Fancher1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChuck Hasenauer / Mike Delia vs Kevin Cain / Alan Mock5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDave Bogan / William Harwood vs Scott Vogel / David Riedmayer7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Adult Men - 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BBTL (A) 3.5M 40 & Over (Ryan)62191332267
2BBTL40/HardenMcMurtry/SunCity44181433281
3BBTL40/Dwyer/TLC26112147326

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Troy Havens
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.45
Steven Nygren
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
William Harwood
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
John Harden
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.32
Ken Hedgecock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
David Streck
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Alan Chase
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Dave Bogan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Chuck Hasenauer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Mark McMurtry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Donald McCarl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Streck + Chuck Hasenauer5169% games+12.6% vs expected
Mark McMurtry + John Harden5265% gamesnot enough data
John Harden + David Streck5261% gamesnot enough data
William Harwood + Mark McMurtry404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Troy Havens
77W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.47
Steven Nygren
32W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
William Harwood
15W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
John Harden
34W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Ken Hedgecock
32W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
David Streck
20W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Alan Chase
8W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Dave Bogan
26W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Chuck Hasenauer
16W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Mark McMurtry
19W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Donald McCarl
15W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.