Teams

IRMSL/Cummings

2025 IRMSL Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-18vs North River Shores/FullettWon 10
W#3 DoublesSandy Palma / Ronnie Williams vs Lisa Cousineau / Jane Fullett6-3, 6-3
2025-11-04vs Harbour Ridge/BabineLost 01
L#2 DoublesRegan Chatel / Pamela Yannotta vs Christianne Coover / Brigite Babine0-6, 6-7
2025-10-28vs North River Shores/FullettWon 10
W#1 DoublesRegan Chatel / Pamela Yannotta vs Lisa Thiesen / Christie Mayer6-1, 6-3
2025-10-14vs Harbour Ridge/BabineWon 10
W#1 DoublesDina Cummings / Pamela Yannotta vs Lori Coates / Joyce Costopoulos2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-07vs North River Shores/FullettWon 10
W#2 DoublesSandy Palma / Eileen Cusumano vs Christie Mayer / Jane Moffat6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Dina Cummings
published
3.81
Lori Glaspey
published
3.71
Regan Chatel
published
3.70
Sandy Palma
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
3.61
Beth Daly
published 4
3.61
Gillian Boice
published
3.37
Eileen Cusumano
published
3.27
Pamela Yannotta
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Angela Wernick
published 3.5
3.14
SHERRY SKINNER
published
Elisabeth Smith
published
Morgann Loyd
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandy Palma + Dina Cummings7064% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Yannotta + SHERRY SKINNER044 matchesnot enough data
Eileen Cusumano + Angela Wernick213 matchesnot enough data
Regan Chatel + Dina Cummings303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Dina Cummings
17W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
Lori Glaspey
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.81
Regan Chatel
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.71
Sandy Palma
119W–104L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.70
4
Beth Daly
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Gillian Boice
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.61
Eileen Cusumano
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Pamela Yannotta
59W–68L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Angela Wernick
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
SHERRY SKINNER
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Elisabeth Smith
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marie-Paule Cafmeyer
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Morgann Loyd
18W–30L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.