Teams

KY/LOU/HAMILTON/MAZZONI

2025 USTA COMBO 55 & Over · 6.5 Women

21 players · average NTRP 3.17 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-09-27vs KY/LOU/COOK/STEENLost 12
W#1 DoublesDana Collins / Kim DeVries vs Mary Jones / Tina Cline6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLolly Buckingham / Carolyn Hoge vs Karen Sturm / Ellen Clements3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDeanna Gordinier / Elizabeth Torp vs Michelle Winebrenner / Kathy Lesmeister7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-09-21vs KY/LOU/JONES/GRIFFINLost 12
L#1 DoublesMashelle Kiggins / Dianna Mazzoni vs Michele Coan / Nancy Jones4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Gunn / Deanna Gordinier vs Terri Saylor / Elizabeth Curtin7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesLolly Buckingham / Elizabeth Torp vs Lawanda Page / Karen Griffin4-6, 0-6
2025-09-13vs KY/LOU/DAVIS/SANFORDWon 30
W#1 DoublesMargy Stivers / Lillian Hunt vs Christine Montgomery / Kathleen Mattingly7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMelissa Weidman / Lisa Singerman vs Marianne Deptola / Deborah Roberts7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesFran Ferrell / Mashelle Kiggins vs Mary Helen Davis / Tracye Cobourn6-4, 6-3
2025-09-07vs KY/LOU/COOK/STEENWon 21
L#1 DoublesDianna Mazzoni / Denise Puthuff vs Stephanie Kellerman / Karen Sturm4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLolly Buckingham / Carolyn Hoge vs Michelle Winebrenner / Tamara Duvall-McClain6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKim DeVries / Lori Cook vs Shannon Elder / Mary Beth Meagher6-4, 6-2
2025-08-16vs KY/LOU/JONES/GRIFFINWon 20
W#1 DoublesGayle Ciliberti / Dana Collins vs Karen Griffin / Kim Greenrose7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPatricia Dye / Penny DeVenuto vs Terri Saylor / Elizabeth Curtin5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-10vs KY/LOU/DAVIS/SANFORDWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Hoge / Penny DeVenuto vs Cathy Wheeler / Chris Hendrich7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Lampton / Lori Cook vs Christine Montgomery / Kathleen Mattingly2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelissa Weidman / Sandra Littles vs Shelley Kinslow / Marianne Deptola4-6, 4-6
2025-08-01vs KY/LOU/COOK/STEENSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDenise Puthuff / Margy Stivers vs Donna Mattingly / Tamy Holmes6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMelissa Weidman / Susan Gunn vs Lisa Steen / Michelle Winebrenner4-6, 2-6
2025-07-27vs KY/LOU/JONES/GRIFFINLost 12
W#1 DoublesDana Collins / Deanna Gordinier vs Lawanda Page / Karen Weathers6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLori Cook / Gayle Ciliberti vs Sharen Hayden / Karen Griffin3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDenise Puthuff / Patricia Dye vs Candy Fischbach / Kim Johnson0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-07-19vs KY/LOU/DAVIS/SANFORDLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Lampton / Lillian Hunt vs Karen Voorhees / Tracye Cobourn0-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSusan Gunn / Fran Ferrell vs Kathleen Mattingly / Mary Helen Davis2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLolly Buckingham / Carolyn Hoge vs Chris Hendrich / Cathy Wheeler6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LOU/JONES/GRIFFIN63171022202
2KY/LOU/HAMILTON/MAZZONI45131432280
3KY/LOU/DAVIS/SANFORD36121534264

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Dana Collins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Lisa Singerman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Lillian Hunt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Mashelle Kiggins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Penny DeVenuto
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.12
Denise Puthuff
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Sandra Littles
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Carolyn Hoge
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
Susan Gunn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.93
Deanna Gordinier
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Elizabeth Torp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Lolly Buckingham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Kim DeVries
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.74
Dianna Mazzoni
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Patricia Dye
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Amy Lampton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.68
Fran Ferrell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Melissa Weidman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Margy Stivers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.61
Gayle Ciliberti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Kris Hamilton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Lampton + Fran Ferrell2446% games+8.8% vs expected
Gayle Ciliberti + Deanna Gordinier2447% games+3.8% vs expected
Margy Stivers + Gayle Ciliberti5648% games+2.8% vs expected
Lolly Buckingham + Carolyn Hoge5450% games+1.8% vs expected
Gayle Ciliberti + Kim DeVries3252% games−1.8% vs expected
Dianna Mazzoni + Denise Puthuff1738% games−9.7% vs expected
Patricia Dye + Amy Lampton044 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Dye + Fran Ferrell404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dana Collins
17W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Lisa Singerman
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
Lillian Hunt
22W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Mashelle Kiggins
36W–43L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.16
Penny DeVenuto
16W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Denise Puthuff
21W–46L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.12
Sandra Littles
13W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Carolyn Hoge
15W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
Susan Gunn
14W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Deanna Gordinier
35W–64L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Elizabeth Torp
23W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
Lolly Buckingham
12W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
Kim DeVries
25W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Dianna Mazzoni
7W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
Patricia Dye
19W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.69
3
Amy Lampton
15W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Fran Ferrell
16W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Melissa Weidman
26W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
2.66
Margy Stivers
36W–51L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Gayle Ciliberti
26W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.61
Kris Hamilton
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.