Teams

SFV - Triple Doubles

2024 Adult 18+ Weekday SFV · SFV 18+ WeekDay - 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesCatherine Haggett / Tara Sickmeier vs Goli Afshari / Mia Boudreau6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2024-05-23vs SFV - Sets In The CityLost 01
L#1 SinglesCatherine Haggett vs Cecilia Greenway7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-05-15vs SFV - San Fernando Volley GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Haggett / Melanie Truhett vs Liz Cackowski / Casondra Ruga4-6, 2-6
2024-05-03vs SFV - Love 2 AceWon 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Haggett / Tara Sickmeier vs Kathryn Speer / Terri Admiraal7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesCatherine Haggett vs Angie Wu6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18+ WeekDay - 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Melanie Truhett
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Christine Daniel
published 3.5
3.35
Catherine Haggett
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Christine Steele
published 3.5
3.20
Gina Caruso
published
3.15
Christine de la Hoz
published 3.5
3.14
Madi Rosenberg
published
3.13
Vicki Weinstein
published
3.09
Victoria O Seni
published
2.99
Deborah Kerr-Orlik
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jennifer Lerner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Truhett + Catherine Haggett3450% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Kerr-Orlik + Catherine Haggett033 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Kerr-Orlik + Christine Steele033 matchesnot enough data
Christine Daniel + Madi Rosenberg303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Melanie Truhett
125W–106L career · 3 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.59
3.5
Christine Daniel
15W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Catherine Haggett
99W–122L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Christine Steele
4W–15L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
Gina Caruso
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Christine de la Hoz
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.15
Madi Rosenberg
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.14
Vicki Weinstein
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Victoria O Seni
5W–20L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Deborah Kerr-Orlik
57W–134L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Deborah Goldberger
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Lerner
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.