Teams

SEASCAPE SC CM7.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 7.5

12 players · average NTRP / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesPaul Miller / Richard van der Linde vs Peter McElheny / Brian Hentschke6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSuhas Kshirsagar / Shannon Garrett vs Paul Nguyen / Lester Wang6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMike Talvensaari / Kent Mccaughna vs Mitch Priest / Michael Vogel6-2, 6-4
L#1 DoublesSteve Hilleary / Richard van der Linde vs John Biddle / Malvin Mercado1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesPaul Miller / Kent Mccaughna vs Mitch Priest / Robert Watts6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPete Marinovich / Tad Sterling vs Rodrigo G Alonso / Michael Vogel6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Steve Hilleary
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Suhas Kshirsagar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Shannon Garrett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
James Fitch
published
3.69
Patrick Amaris
published
3.68
Mike Talvensaari
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Ken Pappas
published
3.53
Pete Marinovich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Kent Mccaughna
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Jake Byman
published
3.20
Richard van der Linde
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tad Sterling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Garrett + Suhas Kshirsagar303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steve Hilleary
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.87
Suhas Kshirsagar
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
Shannon Garrett
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
James Fitch
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Patrick Amaris
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Mike Talvensaari
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Ken Pappas
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Pete Marinovich
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Kent Mccaughna
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.39
Jake Byman
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Richard van der Linde
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Tad Sterling
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.