Teams

TKharva-DUR

2026 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 Over Adult 3.5 Men Wknd

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-03-21vs MFossum-HRLost 14
L#1 DoublesIvan Ross / Thomas Newton vs Michael Andre / Rory Dowling6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRaphael Orenstein vs Thomas Johnston1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Lin / Antonio Parham vs Caleb Kent / Christopher Buccafusco1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesRyan Curet vs Michael Klein6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesConor Lynch / Daniel Moore vs Jefferson Balin / Andrew Nelsen1-6, 1-6
2026-03-07vs NPuri18-DURSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDaniel Moore / Raphael Orenstein vs Vijay Sharma / Nishant Puri0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesRyan Curet vs Nitni Agrawal6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesIvan Ross / Dan Passonno vs Rajeev Tonde / Vishal Gupta7-6, 7-5
L#2 SinglesTejas Kharva vs Ryan Jobling2-6, 2-6
2026-03-06vs SPanthri-DURLost 04
L#1 DoublesJordan Curet / Ryan Curet vs Kevin Kokal / Anish Arya6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesIvan Ross / Dan Passonno vs Kaushik Vemulapalli / Adam Bernstein7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesTejas Kharva vs Ravi Verma4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesConor Lynch / Joshua Hunter vs Kirill Kochkin / Rajiv Nair1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 Over Adult 3.5 Men Wknd have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Ryan Curet
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.42
Ivan Ross
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Anthony Rizzuto
published 3.5
3.29
Tejas Kharva
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Dan Passonno
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Conor Lynch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.99
Joshua Hunter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Antonio Parham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Raphael Orenstein
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jordan Curet
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Conor Lynch + Raphael Orenstein123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Curet
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
Ivan Ross
14W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.42
3.5
Anthony Rizzuto
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Tejas Kharva
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Dan Passonno
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Conor Lynch
10W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Joshua Hunter
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.99
3.5
Antonio Parham
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.89
Raphael Orenstein
6W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Jordan Curet
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.