Teams

OC Los Cab - Tracy

2025 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC 5.0+ Women WE

17 players · average NTRP 4.80 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-12-20vs OC LLW LPC - Michelle Hay - Sat3Won 21
W#1 DoublesDebbie Spence-Nasim / Jami Jones vs Katherine Cecil / Lauren Yoon6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKathy Archibald vs Audrey Yoon6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesFarrah Northcott / Marivick Mamiit vs Michelle Hay / Christine Blair6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-11-30vs OC LNRC - Maggie- Sat1030Lost 12
W#1 DoublesDebbie Spence-Nasim / Jami Jones vs Maggie Mello Harrah / Angela Hendy6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesFarrah Northcott vs Brynn Boren0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Beindorf / Amy Caldwell vs Lauren Spencer / McCall da Pron5-7, 3-6
2025-11-08vs OC LLW LPC - Michelle Hay - Sat3Won 21
W#1 DoublesDebbie Spence-Nasim / Sanem Ahearn vs Crystal Juan / Audrey Yoon6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJennifer Beindorf vs Gabby Lee2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnja Clarke / Amy Caldwell vs Christine Blair / Dianne Matias6-2, 7-6
2025-10-19vs OC La Habra TC - Leonard Sun130Won 21
W#1 DoublesKathy Archibald / Eleanor Hammargren vs Karen Trinh / Laurie Rhode6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKathryn Settles vs Quynh Le6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesFarrah Northcott / Karen Haas vs Serena Ko / Janet Lin6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 5.0+ Women WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.66 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.03
Kathy Archibald
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
5.03
Kathryn Settles
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
5.02
Debbie Spence-Nasim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.93
Sanem Ahearn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.92
Anja Clarke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.90
4.89
Jami Jones
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.64
Eleanor Hammargren
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.61
Jennifer Beindorf
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.57
Farrah Northcott
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.30
Dana Kim
published 4.5
4.26
Karen Haas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
Nikki Fermin
published
4.01
Emily Orlove
published
Marivick Mamiit
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
So-Young Walsh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Archibald + Eleanor Hammargren4164% games+4.9% vs expected
Debbie Spence-Nasim + Jami Jones213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathy Archibald
17W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
5.03
Kathryn Settles
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
5.03
5
Debbie Spence-Nasim
12W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
5.02
Sanem Ahearn
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.93
5
Anja Clarke
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.92
5
Amanda Parson Siegel
33W–9L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.90
Jami Jones
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.89
Eleanor Hammargren
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.64
Jennifer Beindorf
15W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.61
Farrah Northcott
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.57
4.5
Dana Kim
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.30
Karen Haas
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.26
Nikki Fermin
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Carolina Groff Hinojosa
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
4.01
Emily Orlove
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marivick Mamiit
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
So-Young Walsh
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.