Teams

FREMONT HILLS CC 40MX7.0A

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0

26 players · average NTRP 3.55 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Emily Ling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Tracy Roeder
published
3.86
Jacob Loomis
published 4
3.80
PETER NGUYEN
published
3.77
Joseph Borau
published
3.71
Bob Kamangar
published 4
3.68
Chris Ling
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.51
Claiborne Brown
published 3.5
3.38
Paula Guslani
published
3.38
Rebecca Gyr
published
3.31
Jenny Peck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Cindy Lunk
published 3.5
3.22
Sue Lin Holt
published
3.17
Pookie Kochatchawan
published
3.14
Daniel Houlbrook
published 3.5
3.04
Scott Akiyama
published
3.00
Jillian Draeger
published
2.99
Jung Yoon
published
2.97
Chi Buckley
published 3
2.87
Elaine Chong
published 3
2.78
Angela Akiyama
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Joanna Berry
published
2.72
Wendy McDowell
published
Mark Belinsky
published
Richard Chatwin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Stewart Sheffield
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pookie Kochatchawan + Mark Belinsky044 matchesnot enough data
Richard Chatwin + Claiborne Brown123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Ling
40W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
Tracy Roeder
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Jacob Loomis
19W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
3.86
PETER NGUYEN
18W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
Joseph Borau
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Bob Kamangar
13W–16L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Chris Ling
31W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Claiborne Brown
49W–29L career · no lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
Paula Guslani
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.38
Rebecca Gyr
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
Jenny Peck
28W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Cindy Lunk
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sue Lin Holt
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Pookie Kochatchawan
21W–31L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Daniel Houlbrook
22W–16L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
Scott Akiyama
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04
Jillian Draeger
29W–17L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.00
Jung Yoon
21W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.99
3
Chi Buckley
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Elaine Chong
42W–27L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Angela Akiyama
24W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
1%94%5%
2.78
Joanna Berry
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%3%97%
2.75
Wendy McDowell
24W–22L career · no lines in 2025
0%4%96%
2.72
Mark Belinsky
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Chatwin
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stewart Sheffield
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.