Teams

Magnolia Green Winters

2023 Richmond Flexible Format Women · Richmond Flexible Format Women 6.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Richmond Flexible Format Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Lauren Bale
published
3.20
2.65
Dana Chenevert
published 2.5
2.59
Stephanie Scheel
published
Georgia LeNoir
published
Katherine Jimenez
published
Keri Biggins
published
Molly Palenski
published
Natalie Winters
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Bale
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Annella Safford Baker
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
2.5
Dana Chenevert
15W–21L career · no lines in 2023
0%14%86%
2.65
Stephanie Scheel
8W–16L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
2.59
Georgia LeNoir
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katherine Jimenez
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Keri Biggins
8W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Molly Palenski
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Natalie Winters
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.