Teams

Thompson - Genesis, Rock Road

2023 KS 18 & Over Adult Outdoor League · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesDebra Ferris / Matawee Paksin vs Dana Hill / Molly Cyphert6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDuygu Uzun vs Pam van Bebber6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNallely Romo-Neuray / Patricia Thompson vs Amanda Moreira / Paula Bette6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMEGAN AST / Katie Qu vs Rosanne Greene / Jennifer Lee6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesPatricia Thompson / Mary Stinson vs Dana Hill / Alisa Franco6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesDuygu Uzun vs Amanda Moreira6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNallely Romo-Neuray / Debra Ferris vs Molly Cyphert / Carole Ryan6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMatawee Paksin vs Paula Bette4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKatie Qu / MEGAN AST vs Rosanne Greene / Jennifer Lee6-0, 6-0
2023-06-25vs Boardman - SalinaSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMatawee Paksin / Katie Qu vs Megan Salas / Allyson Salas2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDuygu Uzun vs Amy Pihl6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesPatricia Thompson / Nallely Romo-Neuray vs Addison Flower / Kim Disberger0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBobbie Lee / Debra Ferris vs Bianca Bulnes / MJ Sharp1-6, 0-6
2023-06-25vs Boardman - SalinaSplit 22
L#1 DoublesPatricia Thompson / Nallely Romo-Neuray vs Megan Salas / Amy Pihl1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesDuygu Uzun vs Laurel Driskell6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDebra Ferris / Bobbie Lee vs Bianca Bulnes / Allyson Salas1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMatawee Paksin / Katie Qu vs Cindy Reed / Kim Disberger7-6, 6-1
2023-06-11vs KS/Cowan/Vetter/18&Over3.0WLost 04
L#1 DoublesMary Stinson / Patricia Thompson vs Katie Hund / Andrea Zynda6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMatawee Paksin vs Angela Vetter3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBobbie Lee / Debra Ferris vs Macaela Harris / Christy Cox5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Qu / Jacqueline Montoya vs Traci Swindler / Dotsie Cuillo0-3
2023-06-11vs KS/Cowan/Vetter/18&Over3.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebra Ferris / Katie Qu vs Katie Hund / Traci Swindler0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Thompson / Jacqueline Montoya vs Andrea Zynda / Felicia Matthies6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBobbie Lee / Matawee Paksin vs Michelle Breault / Macaela Harris1-6, 3-6
2023-06-04vs Trout/Orme- Wichita Country ClubSplit 22
L#1 DoublesPatricia Thompson / Jacqueline Montoya vs Elaine Reddick-Cooley / Elizabeth Orme5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMatawee Paksin vs Mariah Moxley1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBobbie Lee / Nallely Romo-Neuray vs Mary Jane Mullen / Danielle Hoover6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDebra Ferris / Katie Qu vs Julie Trout / Marna Orme6-0, 6-4
2023-06-04vs Trout/Orme- Wichita Country ClubWon 40
W#1 DoublesNallely Romo-Neuray / Jacqueline Montoya vs Elaine Reddick-Cooley / Mariah Moxley6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDebra Ferris / Bobbie Lee vs Denise Delcore / Ipek Born6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMatawee Paksin vs Elizabeth Orme4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKatie Qu / MEGAN AST vs Julie Trout / Karla Fazio6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Bobbie Lee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Katie Qu
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
Nallely Romo-Neuray
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.74
Patricia Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.73
Matawee Paksin
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.73
Debra Ferris
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Duygu Uzun
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
Jacqueline Montoya
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Jennifer Lette
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nallely Romo-Neuray + Jacqueline Montoya5160% games+11.6% vs expected
Debra Ferris + Katie Qu7259% games+2.0% vs expected
Bobbie Lee + Nallely Romo-Neuray7653% games+0.7% vs expected
Bobbie Lee + Patricia Thompson8752% games−1.3% vs expected
Patricia Thompson + Katie Qu7553% games−1.6% vs expected
Bobbie Lee + Katie Qu10752% games−2.3% vs expected
Nallely Romo-Neuray + Patricia Thompson9749% games−4.5% vs expected
Bobbie Lee + Debra Ferris2442% games−8.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bobbie Lee
61W–61L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
2.85
Katie Qu
50W–43L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
Nallely Romo-Neuray
91W–61L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
Patricia Thompson
81W–68L career · 7 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74
Matawee Paksin
37W–61L career · 8 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Debra Ferris
24W–28L career · 8 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Duygu Uzun
36W–15L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jacqueline Montoya
25W–21L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Lette
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.