Teams

Red Ledges-Wood

2021 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 2.5W

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-12-06vs Park City MARC-KinkeadWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesMichelle Stauffer / Suly Cates vs Shari Noteware / Lori Pfeiffer6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-11-15vs Sports Mall-LyonLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesMichelle Stauffer / Melissa Smith vs Kelly Wilcox / Lora Lyon0-6, 2-6
2021-11-01vs Park City MARC-KruegerWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesShana Wood / Michelle Stauffer vs Kathleen DiCesaris / Marianne Miceli7-6, 4-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Jocelyn Bennion
published
3.08
Megan Overton
published
3.00
Carly Johnston
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Elisabeth Jones
published 3
2.63
Shana Wood
published 3
2.55
Stefanie Maddox
usually #3 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 25% · published 3
2.33
Lindsay Egan
published
2.30
Michelle Stauffer
usually #2 Female Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.27
Suly Cates
published
Melissa Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Stauffer + Lindsay Egan3347% games+11.3% vs expected
Carly Johnston + Elisabeth Jones4845% games+7.9% vs expected
Carly Johnston + Shana Wood132050% games+6.3% vs expected
Carly Johnston + Stefanie Maddox7552% games+6.1% vs expected
Carly Johnston + Megan Overton231553% games+2.8% vs expected
Shana Wood + Megan Overton101543% games+1.3% vs expected
Shana Wood + Elisabeth Jones6746% games−2.6% vs expected
Stefanie Maddox + Elisabeth Jones131054% games−3.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jocelyn Bennion
109W–81L career · no lines in 2021
<1%19%81%
3.62
Megan Overton
89W–93L career · no lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Carly Johnston
109W–121L career · type A · 6 lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Elisabeth Jones
64W–80L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Shana Wood
85W–130L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Stefanie Maddox
69W–80L career · 4 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
2.55
Lindsay Egan
25W–49L career · no lines in 2021
0%91%9%
2.33
2.5
Michelle Stauffer
41W–60L career · 3 lines in 2021
0%94%6%
2.30
Suly Cates
20W–23L career · no lines in 2021
0%96%4%
2.27
Melissa Smith
18W–19L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.