Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Swensen/Sampson

2023 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 3.5W

18 players · average NTRP 3.70 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-12-12vs Ogden-AndersenWon 10
W#3 Female DoublesJessica Gardner / Allison Christenson vs Tana Coleman / Carrie Johnson6-4, 6-1
2023-12-05vs Cottonwood Club-AnnunziataSplit 11
W#2 Female DoublesKristen Okland / Diane Creamer vs Angie Nelden / Jeanette Shepard6-4, 5-3
L#3 Female DoublesMikkel Williams / Emily Waltman vs Sarah Collins / Jennie Bethers6-3, 4-5, 0-1
2023-11-28vs Sports Mall-Lake/KnowltonWon 10
W#1 Female SinglesEmily Waltman vs Britany Egan6-1, 6-3
2023-11-14vs Liberty Park Tennis-Handlon/AssemiSplit 11
W#1 Female SinglesDiane Creamer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 Female DoublesAllison Christenson / Manal Hall vs Elisabeth Nebeker / Hannah Lee0-6, 5-7
W#1 Female DoublesDiane Creamer / Dalynn Thomas vs Molly Adams / Rebecca Harman6-1, 6-4
W#3 Female DoublesAllison Christenson / Kristen Okland vs Jane Chandramouli / Delia Bayna6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 3.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sports Mall-Shoff/Brown602138115
2Liberty Park Tennis-Swensen/Sampson6016821161
3Sunpro-Parker/Stringham5116820172
4Salt Lake Tennis-Cracroft4215922182
5Sunpro-Westover/Hall42111329189
6Cottonwood Club-Annunziata3315923203
7Sports Mall-Lake/Knowlton3316824206
8Liberty Park Tennis-Handlon/Assemi33131128207
9Ivory Ridge-Adams3391531214
10Ivory Ridge-Rowland/Aubrey24101430205
11Ogden-Andersen2491533225
12Wasatch Rec Center-Wade/Dagley2471736232
13Liberty Park Tennis-Leishman/Ewing1581636240
14Sports Mall-England/Rozsa1571737238
15Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna/Chandromouli0671736237

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Emily Waltman
usually #1 Female Singles 50%, also #3 Female Doubles 50% · published 4
Dalynn Thomas
published 4
3.72
Kim Cronin
usually #2 Female Doubles 40%, also #3 Female Doubles 40% · published 4
3.63
Annette Knight
published 4
3.55
Katie Swensen
published
3.48
Jessica Gardner
published
3.38
Michelle Maxfield
published
3.37
Gretel Sampson
usually #3 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Diane Creamer
usually #1 Female Doubles 33%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Heather Hayes
published 3.5
3.26
Alena Taylor
published 3.5
3.19
Allison Christenson
usually #3 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Kristen Okland
published
3.16
Manal Hall
usually #2 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Mindy Christensen
published
2.88
Melissa Ford
published
Julie Hall
published
Lisa Stebbing
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Gardner + Gretel Sampson5752% games+8.9% vs expected
Manal Hall + Lisa Stebbing1443% games+8.1% vs expected
Alena Taylor + Michelle Maxfield7850% games+7.3% vs expected
Emily Waltman + Heather Hayes8066% games+6.1% vs expected
Kim Cronin + Katie Swensen13362% games+5.9% vs expected
Kim Cronin + Jessica Gardner10854% games+5.8% vs expected
Katie Swensen + Lisa Stebbing9456% games+5.5% vs expected
Katie Swensen + Heather Hayes4447% games+5.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Waltman
102W–39L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
3.93
4
Dalynn Thomas
77W–68L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Kim Cronin
380W–238L career · 5 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Annette Knight
58W–66L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.63
Katie Swensen
102W–84L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
Jessica Gardner
81W–71L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
Michelle Maxfield
204W–139L career · no lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
3.38
3.5
Gretel Sampson
200W–198L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Diane Creamer
116W–110L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Heather Hayes
84W–67L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Alena Taylor
174W–200L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Allison Christenson
94W–79L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.19
Kristen Okland
79W–74L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Manal Hall
111W–167L career · 1 line in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
Mindy Christensen
93W–100L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
Melissa Ford
107W–74L career · no lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
2.88
Julie Hall
24W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Stebbing
95W–57L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.