Teams

WI Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 NEL Valley Addo

2022 WI Mixed 18 & Over · WI Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesIvor Addo / Patricia Lison-Sheikh vs Duane Brandt / Ann Franz6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNathan Barash / Tara Sherman vs Brian Spaeth / Zita Wenda7-5, 6-4
W#1 DoublesSteve Petrinski / Galina Petrinska vs Duane Brandt / Zita Wenda6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChristy Policy / Pramod Shinde vs Brian Spaeth / Amy Buege2-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesSteve Petrinski / Galina Petrinska vs Kevin Struck / Ginna Trowbridge6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNathan Barash / Tara Sherman vs Thomas Blend / Brenda Blend6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAmy Addo / Tyler Linscott vs Ken Redman / Cynthia Joa6-2, 7-5
W#1 DoublesNathan Barash / Tara Sherman vs Kevin Struck / Ginna Trowbridge6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTswvyim Yang / Amy Addo vs Aaron Radder / Kelly Kasten6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTyler Linscott / Michelle Vandenberg vs Ken Redman / Brenda Blend6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesNathan Barash / Patricia Lison-Sheikh vs Kevin Struck / Ginna Trowbridge6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBill van Nuland / Kaitlyn Jonen vs Aaron Radder / Kristen Quast6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSteve Petrinski / Galina Petrinska vs John Park / Sheri Brannen4-6, 1-1
W#1 DoublesAmy Addo / Chad Patch vs Aaron Radder / Sheri Brannen6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBill van Nuland / Kaitlyn Jonen vs Thomas Blend / Kristen Quast6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesIvor Addo / Tara Sherman vs Ken Redman / Brenda Blend6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesAmy Addo / Bill van Nuland vs Zita Wenda / David Gahagan6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesIvor Addo / Patricia Lison-Sheikh vs Brian Spaeth / Haley Franz6-2, 6-4
L#1 DoublesKaitlyn Jonen / Chad Patch vs Brian Spaeth / Zita Wenda4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAmy Addo / Tswvyim Yang vs Ann Franz / David Gahagan4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesIvor Addo / Patricia Lison-Sheikh vs Todd Hammond / Haley Franz6-0, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · WI Mixed 18 & Over 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 NEL Valley Addo802139145
2WI Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 NEL Oshkosh Hammond44101429235
3WI Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 NEL Kohler Blend0851941273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Patricia Lison-Sheikh
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.83
Kaitlyn Jonen
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Ivor Addo
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.65
Amy Addo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.64
Steve Petrinski
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Chad Patch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Bill van Nuland
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.48
Michelle Vandenberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Tara Sherman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.31
Mary Underhill
published 3.5
3.26
Christy Policy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Pramod Shinde
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Galina Petrinska
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Nathan Barash
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Tswvyim Yang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Petrinski + Galina Petrinska5161% gamesnot enough data
Ivor Addo + Patricia Lison-Sheikh6081% gamesnot enough data
Nathan Barash + Tara Sherman3255% gamesnot enough data
Amy Addo + Chad Patch224 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Vandenberg + Pramod Shinde303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Patricia Lison-Sheikh
187W–43L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.92
Kaitlyn Jonen
177W–96L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Ivor Addo
104W–18L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Amy Addo
141W–32L career · 9 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
Steve Petrinski
94W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Chad Patch
74W–53L career · 6 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Bill van Nuland
22W–14L career · 10 lines in 2022
44%55%<1%
3.52
Michelle Vandenberg
86W–35L career · 1 line in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
Tara Sherman
150W–105L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Mary Underhill
38W–23L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Christy Policy
47W–41L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Pramod Shinde
45W–31L career · 1 line in 2022
8%91%1%
3.19
3
Galina Petrinska
54W–40L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.05
Nathan Barash
114W–68L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tswvyim Yang
14W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.