Teams

Cooper/Fayetteville/SRC

2026 Adult 40 & Over Spring 3 League · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-04vs Feilke/Fayetteville/FACWon 30
W#1 DoublesNora Cooper / Amber Anderson vs Emily Curry / Melissa McCarty6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKathryn Panek vs Linzay Feilke6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Mitchell / Cheryl Williams vs Brooke Johnson / Kristy Sykes6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-18vs Douglas/Springdale/SRCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Nelson / Tania Brewer vs Andi Douglas / Kelsey Lewis7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNora Cooper / Kathryn Panek vs Cathy Knight / Susan McCarthy6-1, 6-2
2026-04-12vs McDougall/Rogers/SVCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMisti Lira / Karen Nelson vs Mary Ruoff / Laura McDougall6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCassie Ross / Cheryl Williams vs Sofie Coleman / Kelley Herr0-6, 0-6
2026-04-12vs Feilke/Fayetteville/FACWon 21
W#1 DoublesNora Cooper / Amber Anderson vs Brooke Johnson / Joanna McCusker6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKathryn Panek vs Molly Puryear6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Mitchell / Annie Frail vs Linzay Feilke / Lindsay Daniel0-6, 2-6
2026-04-11vs McDougall/Rogers/SVCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMisti Lira / Elizabeth Mitchell vs Mary Ruoff / Denise Contreras6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKathryn Panek vs Laura Phillips6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCheryl Williams / Cassie Ross vs Laura McDougall / Sofie Coleman0-6, 2-6
2026-03-19vs Shideler/BV/KTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Nelson / Cheryl Williams vs Dawn Adams / Barbara Taylor5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesNora Cooper vs Elizabeth Wallace7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKathryn Panek / Misti Lira vs Tina Shideler / Audra Peterson6-2, 6-4
2026-03-17vs Shideler/BV/KTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesCheryl Williams / Elizabeth Mitchell vs Robin Sumpter / Barbara Taylor3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKathryn Panek vs Meagan Flake3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnnie Frail / Cassie Ross vs Jenna Bunner / Britney Zimmer1-6, 3-6
2026-03-05vs Douglas/Springdale/SRCLost 02
L#1 DoublesMisti Lira / Cheryl Williams vs Andi Douglas / Alicia Short4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKathryn Panek vs Kelsey Lewis2-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Shideler/BV/KTC7118614176
2Douglas/Springdale/SRC53131128222
3McDougall/Rogers/SVCC44121225195
4Cooper/Fayetteville/SRC44121226204
5Feilke/Fayetteville/FAC0851940258

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.66
Nora Cooper
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.53
Kathryn Panek
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.27
Misti Lira
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #4 Doubles 29% · published
2.08
Tania Brewer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.05
Cheryl Williams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.02
Cassie Ross
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.00
Annie Frail
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cassie Ross + Annie Frail044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nora Cooper
14W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%13%87%
2.66
Kathryn Panek
19W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%40%60%
2.53
Misti Lira
12W–25L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Tania Brewer
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
2.5
Cheryl Williams
4W–39L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Cassie Ross
0W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
2.5
Annie Frail
2W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.