Teams

Plant City 55+ - P. Smith

2026 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesJulie Goodwin / Debra Summers vs Lisa Marinez / Elizabeth DeConti3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDorothy Flair / Rachel Ray vs Pat Morris / Deborah Brown6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPatricia Smith / Kandy Wood vs Cindy Sparks / Sonia Cecilia Slaven6-2, 6-1
2026-03-07vs Apollo Beach - J. FeeneyLost 12
L#1 DoublesKandy Wood / Debra Summers vs Kathleen Gafarian / Donna Whiting4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Goodwin / Jackie Wyckoff vs Cissy Barr / Amalia Alaniz6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPatricia Smith / Rosa Jean vs Jane Feeney / Lynn Malarz4-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesPatricia Smith / Angie Mudge vs Wei Xue / Roseann McNichol6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKandy Wood / Julianna Holbrook vs Sherry Peterson / Tina Sturdevant6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRosa Jean / Dorothy Flair vs Tricia Cardoso / Karen Cleland1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesCatherine Mueller / Karen Hogg vs Lisa Marinez / Marieglory Quinones6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDebra Summers / Kandy Wood vs Pat Morris / Karan Orbegoso6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPatricia Smith / Julianna Holbrook vs Sonia Cecilia Slaven / Cindy Sparks4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-02-14vs Apollo Beach - J. FeeneyLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Mueller / Kandy Wood vs Kathleen Gafarian / Lynn Malarz2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJackie Wyckoff / Rosa Jean vs Amalia Alaniz / Donna Whiting3-4
L#3 DoublesPatricia Smith / Susan Rind vs Ginger Marchiniak / Nancy Matuszak3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesAngie Mudge / Debra Summers vs Peggy Pusateri / Sherry Peterson7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDorothy Flair / Rachel Ray vs Roseann McNichol / Karen Cachion4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Goodwin / Patricia Smith vs Hannah Gabora / Tricia Cardoso1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesCatherine Mueller / Rosa Jean vs Lisa Marinez / Shanna Kim5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAngie Mudge / Debra Summers vs Deborah Brown / Pamela Woodham6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJulie Goodwin / Kandy Wood vs Pat Morris / Kathleen Daciek2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-01-24vs Apollo Beach - J. FeeneyWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan MOSHER / Angie Mudge vs Barbara Dolan / Mary Raymond6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCatherine Mueller / Karen Hogg vs Jane Feeney / Karen Montembeault6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRachel Ray / Dorothy Flair vs Amalia Alaniz / Cissy Barr6-0, 6-1
W#1 DoublesKaren Hogg / Kandy Wood vs Hannah Gabora / Karen Cachion7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Goodwin / Jackie Wyckoff vs Roseann McNichol / Theresa Mays4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPatricia Smith / Susan Rind vs Margaret Filbert / Sherry Peterson0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Karen Hogg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Angie Mudge
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Catherine Mueller
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
Susan MOSHER
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Debra Summers
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.59
Julie Goodwin
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.55
Kandy Wood
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.55
Patricia Smith
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
2.53
Jackie Wyckoff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Julianna Holbrook
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.38
Dorothy Flair
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.38
Susan Rind
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Rosa Jean
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jackie Wyckoff + Julie Goodwin11035% games−5.3% vs expected
Catherine Mueller + Kandy Wood2543% gamesnot enough data
Catherine Mueller + Karen Hogg2450% gamesnot enough data
Kandy Wood + Karen Hogg4158% gamesnot enough data
Julianna Holbrook + Susan Rind134 matchesnot enough data
Kandy Wood + Debra Summers134 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Smith + Susan Rind033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Karen Hogg
84W–99L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Angie Mudge
49W–103L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Catherine Mueller
26W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Susan MOSHER
16W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Debra Summers
7W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Julie Goodwin
6W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59
3
Kandy Wood
53W–82L career · 7 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Patricia Smith
6W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
Jackie Wyckoff
8W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
2.53
Julianna Holbrook
60W–151L career · 2 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.39
Dorothy Flair
10W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.38
Susan Rind
1W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.38
Rosa Jean
28W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.