Teams

Berry Next Point

Spring Adult 65 & Over Doubles · 6.0 Men 65s

7 players · average NTRP 3.12 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-20vs 65+ Sun CityLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Stommel / Steve Thompson vs John Webb / Bruce Benson4-6, 2-6
2026-06-13vs 65+ Sun CityLost 02
L#1 DoublesEd Boufford / Peter Wachholz vs Tom Work / Steve Fry6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSteve Thompson / John Stommel vs Gus Boukarroum / John Partain1-6, 3-6
2026-05-30vs 65+ Sun CityLost 02
L#1 DoublesEd Boufford / Steve Thompson vs Doug Rockwell / Gus Boukarroum1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDanny Walker / Peter Wachholz vs Christopher Davis / Ronald Musselman1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-05-02vs 65+ Sun CityLost 02
L#2 DoublesJohn Stommel / Danny Walker vs Bruce Benson / John Partain4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesEd Boufford / Charles Eads vs Gus Boukarroum / Doug Rockwell0-6, 2-6
2026-04-25vs 65+ Sun CitySplit 11
L#1 DoublesJames R Polkinghorn / Steve Thompson vs John Partain / Doug Rockwell5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCharles Eads / Danny Walker vs Christopher Davis / Bruce Mcintosh3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-18vs 65+ Sun CityLost 12
L#1 DoublesJames R Polkinghorn / Daniel Snyder vs Doug Rockwell / Gus Boukarroum3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Stommel / Charles Eads vs Ronald Musselman / Bruce Mcintosh4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDanny Walker / Sal Uglietta vs Bruce Benson / John Partain6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Men 65s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

James R Polkinghorn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Danny Walker
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.94
John Stommel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Sal Uglietta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Peter Wachholz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Charles Eads
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.51
Ed Boufford
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danny Walker + Peter Wachholz224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
James R Polkinghorn
3W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Danny Walker
126W–63L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.08
John Stommel
31W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
Sal Uglietta
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Peter Wachholz
15W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Charles Eads
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
2.65
3
Ed Boufford
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.