Teams

Flowers

2023 Leon Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2023-12-05vs VoorheesWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary MacKo / Teresa Ransom vs Claire Chiara / Denise Whitlock6-0, 6-1
2023-11-28vs Leon/Marino/Combo18&Over6.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristelle Roper / Mary MacKo vs Amy Kirkpatrick / Leah Marino6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2023-11-20Split 11
W#2 DoublesMary MacKo / Karen Devorace vs Debbie Hall / Beth Keating6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesClaire Chiara / MICHELLE BEMBRY vs Cheryl Tomlinson / Celeste Ivory6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-11-13vs SirianniWon 10
W#2 DoublesClaire Chiara / MICHELLE BEMBRY vs Debbie Hall / Diana Allee7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2023-10-31vs Leon/Marino/Combo18&Over6.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesJane Sukuro / Mary MacKo vs Eva Fernandez / Arianna Fernandez2-6, 6-7
2023-10-30Won 10
W#3 DoublesClaire Chiara / Sharon Banasiewicz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-23Won 10
W#3 DoublesMary MacKo / Sharon Banasiewicz vs Cheryl Tomlinson / Beth Keating7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-10-16Lost 01
L#2 DoublesClaire Chiara / MICHELLE BEMBRY vs Debbie Hall / Beth Keating2-6, 2-6
2023-10-10vs Leon/Marino/Combo18&Over6.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesJane Sukuro / Mary MacKo vs Maria Oliver / Andrea Gale6-1, 6-0
2023-10-02vs SirianniLost 01
L#2 DoublesClaire Chiara / Kristen Dodson vs Maryrose Sirianni / Mayra Zimmerman2-6, 1-6
2023-09-26vs VoorheesLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeslee Simpson / Mary MacKo vs Kathy Maus / Linda Huffman3-6, 1-6
2023-09-25Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKristen Dodson / Mary MacKo vs Debbie Hall / Beth Keating2-6, 3-6
2023-09-18Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMICHELLE BEMBRY / Mary MacKo vs Celeste Ivory / Cheryl Tomlinson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.64
Claire Chiara
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
MICHELLE BEMBRY
published
Karen Devorace
published
Leah Marino
published
Linda Huffman
published
Mary MacKo
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
Pamela Perrewe
published
Robyn Flowers
published
Sharon Banasiewicz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary MacKo + Claire Chiara4254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Claire Chiara
46W–68L career · 9 lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
2.64
MICHELLE BEMBRY
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
2.60
Karen Devorace
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leah Marino
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda Huffman
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary MacKo
81W–69L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data
Pamela Perrewe
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robyn Flowers
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sharon Banasiewicz
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.