Teams

Jackson/Byrd

2026 Mixed 18 & Over-SW · 3.5 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-15vs Brookhaven 3.5 MixedLost 12
L#1 DoublesJordan Miller / Emma Bond vs Cory Lambert / Emily Lowery6-8
L#2 DoublesAdam Byrd / Katherine Byrd vs Chad Leggett / Staci Anding2-8
W#3 DoublesDaniel Benefield / Ashley Howell vs Austin Carter / Mary Lindsey Lumley8-6
2026-07-15vs Brookhaven 3.5 MixedWon 21
L#1 DoublesAdam Byrd / Emma Bond vs Cory Lambert / Emily Lowery5-8
W#2 DoublesKatherine Byrd / Jordan Miller vs Austin Carter / Mary Lindsey Lumley8-6
W#3 DoublesDaniel Benefield / Janice Fulton vs Chad Leggett / Staci Anding8-5
2026-07-14vs Brookhaven 3.5 MixedWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrad Youngblood / Katherine Byrd vs Michael Waltman / Taylor Murray8-2
W#2 DoublesBradley Fulton / Janice Fulton vs Austin Carter / Emily Lowery8-5
W#3 DoublesDaniel Benefield / Ashley Howell vs Chad Leggett / Mary Lindsey Lumley8-4
2026-07-14vs Brookhaven 3.5 MixedLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrad Youngblood / Katherine Byrd vs Michael Waltman / Taylor Murray2-8
L#2 DoublesBradley Fulton / Janice Fulton vs Austin Carter / Emily Lowery5-8
L#3 DoublesDaniel Benefield / Ashley Howell vs Chad Leggett / Mary Lindsey Lumley4-8
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Brookhaven 3.5 Mixed2266672
2Jackson/Byrd2266676

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Adam Byrd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Brad Youngblood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Daniel Benefield
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Emma Bond
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Katherine Byrd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Bradley Fulton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Janice Fulton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Fulton + Bradley Fulton314 matchesnot enough data
Emma Bond + Adam Byrd213 matchesnot enough data
Emma Bond + Brad Youngblood213 matchesnot enough data
Brad Youngblood + Katherine Byrd213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adam Byrd
47W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Brad Youngblood
26W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Daniel Benefield
19W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Emma Bond
33W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Katherine Byrd
22W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Bradley Fulton
20W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Janice Fulton
23W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.