Teams

MCAC:BananaSplit:Wright:Waldron

2025 Cape Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed FLT 1

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesAlex Scopeletis / Art Lusty vs Lisa Swansey / Gerard Melillo2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisa McCarthy / John Landers vs Margaret Russell / Scott Muma6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-05-02vs MCAC:Vojtosova:Vojtosova/MajewskLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Landers / Lisa McCarthy vs Jana Vojtasova / David Dwyer4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlex Scopeletis / Peter Waldron vs Jane Craig / Tendoh Timoh0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesAlex Scopeletis / Art Lusty vs Kelly Hampson / Gerard Melillo6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDeanna Waldron / John Landers vs Vinnie Muma / Scott Muma7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-04-11vs MCAC:Vojtosova:Vojtosova/MajewskLost 01
L#1 DoublesDeanna Waldron / John Landers vs Tendoh Timoh / Jane Craig3-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesAlex Scopeletis / Zachary Wright vs Kelly Hampson / Gerard Melillo2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDeanna Waldron / Art Lusty vs Vinnie Muma / Scott Muma2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-04vs MCAC:Vojtosova:Vojtosova/MajewskLost 02
L#1 DoublesZachary Wright / Alex Scopeletis vs Jennifer Majewski / Peter Weinman2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesArt Lusty / Deanna Waldron vs Jane Craig / Tendoh Timoh6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 Mixed FLT 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MCAC:Vojtasova:Majewski60162596
2MCAC:Brown:Swansey339924175
3MCAC:BananaSplit:Wright:Waldron0621633196

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Michelle Waldron
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 41% · published
3.56
Art Lusty
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Alex Scopeletis
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.25
Deanna Waldron
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
John Landers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lisa McCarthy
published
Peter Waldron
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Zachary Wright
published
Zoe Wright
usually #3 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Waldron + Peter Waldron2543% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Waldron + Zachary Wright3248% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Waldron
41W–34L career · 17 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
3.5
Art Lusty
13W–10L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Alex Scopeletis
31W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Deanna Waldron
37W–68L career · 11 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
John Landers
53W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa McCarthy
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Peter Waldron
2W–12L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zachary Wright
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Zoe Wright
2W–7L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.