Teams

Lacy/Memphis

2022 Mixed 18 & Over - Memphis · 6.0 Mixed 18 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-23vs Bratton/MemphisWon 10
W#1 DoublesJon Bell / Natalie Taylor vs Jerry Vaughn / Melony Bratton6-4, 6-2
2022-07-10vs Johnson/MemphisLost 01
L#1 DoublesNatalie Taylor / Seth Thomas vs Caden LeBlanc / Christen Lundgren4-6, 2-6
2022-06-12vs Shipley/MemphisLost 01
L#1 DoublesSeth Thomas / Natalie Taylor vs Richard Kuebler / Liza Livingston1-6, 5-5
2022-06-05vs Yen/MemphisLost 01
L#1 DoublesNatalie Taylor / Seth Thomas vs Jonathan Yen / Nelli Golmeeva6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2022-06-04vs Flanders/MemphisWon 10
W#3 DoublesSeth Thomas / Natalie Taylor vs Kevan Hatamzadeh / Caroline Graves6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Griffin Lonardo
published 4
3.54
Julio Lanfranco
published
3.53
Natalie Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.35
Grace Bann
published 3.5
3.20
Autumn Rich
published 3.5
3.11
Taylor Wetta
published
3.00
Ryan Coopwood
published
2.94
Katherine Lanfranco
published
2.91
Agatha Asemota
published 3
2.82
Susan Northen-Lacy
published
2.79
Lisa Monahan
published
2.77
2.70
Cheryl Body
published 3
Lloyd Nesbitt
published
Michael Synk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Grace Bann + Ryan Coopwood6058% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Body + Lloyd Nesbitt1439% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Griffin Lonardo
59W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
Julio Lanfranco
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%38%62%
3.54
Natalie Taylor
39W–28L career · 5 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Grace Bann
50W–51L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Autumn Rich
25W–60L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Taylor Wetta
21W–21L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Ryan Coopwood
40W–44L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.00
Katherine Lanfranco
20W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Agatha Asemota
20W–34L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91
Susan Northen-Lacy
49W–54L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
Lisa Monahan
27W–43L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Christopher Heimann
30W–15L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Cheryl Body
18W–54L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Lloyd Nesbitt
3W–21L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Synk
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.