Teams

Estey 9.0 - 2025 Summer

2025 MIXED 18 & OVER SUMMER · 9.0 MX (SUN)

16 players · average NTRP 4.44 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-27vs Tretsven 9.0 mixed summerWon 10
W#2 DoublesSam Hobbs / Aria Benjamin vs Nathan Tretsven / Anne Cammack6-2, 7-5
2025-07-20vs Humann 9.0 S25Lost 12
W#1 DoublesChase Johnson / Amanda Hiatt vs Marc Stingley / Michaela Schulz6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKyle Hoffmann / Genevieve Swanson vs Catherine Resch / Michael Jung2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Warden / Marti Estey vs Heidi Jung / Bill Richardson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-13vs King 9.0 Summer ‘25Won 10
W#2 DoublesSam Hobbs / Aria Benjamin vs Todd Schoenwalder / Callee Anderson6-3, 6-2
2025-06-22vs SmileyLost 03
L#1 DoublesChase Johnson / Genevieve Swanson vs Lea Blackwell Favor / Paul Kilburg6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCristina Kazda / Alex Senjem vs Aaron Holland / Maura Smiley6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAria Benjamin / Klenton Willis vs Benjamin Yates / Cynthia Kozloff6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2025-06-08vs Humann 9.0 S25Won 10
W#2 DoublesSam Hobbs / Aria Benjamin vs JON SCHLEY / Jennifer Miller6-1, 6-0
2025-05-04vs SmileyWon 10
W#3 DoublesSam Hobbs / Isabella Lambert vs Oliver Summers / Angela Summers6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 MX (SUN) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.89
Chase Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.57
Joseph Punnoose
published
4.41
Aria Benjamin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.39
Brooke Hapuku
published 4.5
4.33
Alex Senjem
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.27
Isabella Lambert
published
4.05
Brittany Alexander
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Marti Estey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.02
Cristina Kazda
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Amanda Hiatt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.90
Sam Hobbs
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.79
Genevieve Swanson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.72
Andrea Boado
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Stephanie Crowl
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Klenton Willis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kyle Hoffmann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Boado + Chase Johnson6162% games+4.9% vs expected
Alex Senjem + Cristina Kazda3251% games−6.5% vs expected
Brittany Alexander + Alex Senjem4253% games−9.1% vs expected
Kyle Hoffmann + Stephanie Crowl5255% gamesnot enough data
Genevieve Swanson + Chase Johnson5166% gamesnot enough data
Genevieve Swanson + Klenton Willis3346% gamesnot enough data
Klenton Willis + Aria Benjamin3350% gamesnot enough data
Isabella Lambert + Sam Hobbs224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Chase Johnson
28W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.89
Joseph Punnoose
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.57
5
Aria Benjamin
5W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
no projection at this level
4.41
4.5
Brooke Hapuku
29W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
4.39
4.5
Alex Senjem
19W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
4.33
Isabella Lambert
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.27
4.5
Brittany Alexander
24W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
4.05
Marti Estey
18W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
4.05
4.5
Cristina Kazda
13W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
44%56%<1%
4.02
4
Amanda Hiatt
11W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Sam Hobbs
249W–170L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Genevieve Swanson
59W–65L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Andrea Boado
60W–43L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.72
Stephanie Crowl
34W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Klenton Willis
18W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kyle Hoffmann
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.