Teams

CROW CANYON CC 18MX7.0A

2021 MIXED 18 & Over · 18&Over MX7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Harish Natarajan
published 4.5
3.96
Margaret Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.61
Amal Radia
published 4
3.40
Chad Harrison
published 3.5
3.37
Shelley Lober
published
3.36
3.34
Rattana Graff
published
3.29
Craig Schumann
published 3.5
3.25
Dean Christman
published 3.5
3.19
Chris Picht
published 3.5
3.16
Dana Kruger
published 3.5
3.04
Debbie Baker
published 3.5
2.92
Daljeet Singh
published 3.5
2.79
Karen Schumann
published
Bob Tricca
published
Susan Tricca
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Harish Natarajan + Daljeet Singh2437% gamesnot enough data
Margaret Harrison + Chad Harrison1447% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Harish Natarajan
15W–12L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
4.03
Margaret Harrison
325W–140L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Amal Radia
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Chad Harrison
5W–18L career · no lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
3.40
Shelley Lober
13W–17L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.37
Stephanie Chamberlin
21W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
Rattana Graff
4W–17L career · no lines in 2021
89%11%<1%
3.34
3.5
Craig Schumann
6W–6L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Dean Christman
13W–12L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Chris Picht
12W–13L career · no lines in 2021
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Dana Kruger
9W–15L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Debbie Baker
13W–14L career · no lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.04
3.5
Daljeet Singh
3W–25L career · no lines in 2021
73%27%<1%
2.92
Karen Schumann
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
94%6%<1%
2.79
Bob Tricca
3W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Tricca
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.